The museums in the several places have started to impose the entry fees, many people argue that it has the disadvantage of fewer visitors visiting, while this essay argues that it has an advantage because it helps the council to take care of it in a better way.
On the one hand, many people state that due to entry tickets the primary drawback will be the drop in the number of visitors visiting it. That is to say, most of the museums exhibits local culture, when such public places are free to access for everyone it attracts the variety of audience and visitors that can learn about the history of that place. For instance, by visiting the various museums in the Hyderabad, people can come to know the prosperity they had in previous time due to pearl mines if they will impose charge fewer people will be interested. However, I believe that the entry tickets levied on such places are nominal and should not stop anyone from exploring it.
On the other hand, it helps the Government earn money that can be utilised in bearing the maintenance costs of the museum. In other words, these historical sites are too old and requires repair on the regular intervals to keep them up to the mark for visitors, if all the money will be spent from taxpayers' pocket it could be an injustice to them, so if some participation from its visitors could be taken it will help the government to cope up with the expenses. For example, in the Rajasthan a city in India, all the major museums in forts are now maintained by the Archaeological Survey of India with some entrance fees that helps to sustain all the exhibits at the balance costs. Thus, some participation from its visitors helps.
To conclude, imposing entry fees on museums might deter the few people to visit them, while in the long run it presents a useful approach for their sustenance.
The
museums
in the several
places
have
started
to impose the
entry
fees,
many
people
argue that it has the disadvantage of fewer
visitors
visiting, while this essay argues that it has an advantage
because
it
helps
the council to take care of it in a better way.
On the one hand,
many
people
state that due to
entry
tickets the primary drawback will be the drop in the number of
visitors
visiting it.
That is
to say, most of the
museums
exhibits local culture, when such public
places
are free to access for everyone it attracts the variety of audience and
visitors
that can learn about the history of that
place
.
For instance
, by visiting the various
museums
in the Hyderabad,
people
can
come
to know the prosperity they had in previous time due to pearl mines if they will impose charge fewer
people
will
be interested
.
However
, I believe that the
entry
tickets levied on such
places
are nominal and should not
stop
anyone from exploring it.
On the other hand
, it
helps
the
Government
earn money that can be
utilised
in bearing the maintenance costs of the
museum
.
In other words
, these historical sites are too
old
and requires repair on the regular intervals to
keep
them up to the mark for
visitors
, if all the money will
be spent
from taxpayers' pocket it could be an injustice to them,
so
if
some
participation from its
visitors
could
be taken
it will
help
the
government
to cope up with the expenses.
For example
, in the Rajasthan a city in India, all the major
museums
in forts are
now
maintained by the Archaeological Survey of India with
some
entrance fees that
helps
to sustain all the exhibits at the balance costs.
Thus
,
some
participation from its
visitors
helps
.
To conclude
, imposing
entry
fees on
museums
might deter the few
people
to visit them, while in the long run it presents a useful approach for their sustenance.