IT IS AN EXCELLENT IDEA TO RESERVE MONEY ON THE RAILWAY PROJECTS BY THE REGIME. THIS ESSAY WILL COMPLETELY CONCUR WITH THE ABOVE NOTION DUE TO THE MAJOR ADVANTAGE OF DEVELOPING RAILWAYS THAT ROADS. FIRSTLY, THIS ESSAY WILL DISCUSS WHY IT IS FUNDAMENTAL TO SPEND WEALTH ON THE RAILWAYS, AND SECONDLY, WHY THE IDEA OF DEVELOPIN ROADS IS NOT WORTHY.
WHEN WE THINK FROM A PUBLIC POINT OF VIEW, RAILWAYS PROVID A COMFORATBLE, AFFORDABLE AND MAINLY CHEAPER COMMUTING. THIS GIVE AN ENORMOUS PROFITS TO THE GOVERNMENT AS IT COSTS A PENNY FOR CONSTRUCTING THE RAILWAYS. AND, PEOPLE ALSO CAN ABLE TO TRAVEL TROUGH RAILWAYS DUE TO THE LESS EXPENSIVE TICKETS. FOR EXAMPLE, THE UK REGIME DATA OF THE LAST YEAR SHOWED THAT 80% TOTAL EXPENCE CAME FROM RAILWAY AS MANY PREFER TO USE RAILWAYS TO SAVE MONEY FOR A MONTH.
ON THE OTHER SIDE, IF THE AUTHORITY SPEND THEIR MONEY ON ROAD, THEIR ECONOMY NEVER BE RISED AS FAST AS OTHER DEVELOPED CONTINENTS OWNING THAT IT IS EXPENSIVE TO MAINTAIN A ROADS ALL THE COMING YEARS. AS THE AUTHORITY RESPONSIBLE TO FOR BUILDING THE PUBLIC AREAS. IF IT GOT DAMAGE, THEM THE REGIME HAS TO SPEND A ALMOST DOUBLED AMOUNT CURRANCY TO REPAR IT. THIS WOULD RESULT IN A ZERO LEVEL OF PROGRESS FRON AN ECONOMIC POINT OF VIEW. CONSEQUENTLY, THE TERRITORY WOULD FALL A DECADES BEHIND IN COMPARISON TO SUCCESSFUL TERITORIES.
IN CONCLUSION, THE RAILWAYS AND THE ROADD BOTH THE MEANS OF TRANSPORTATIN FACILITIES INDEED CARRY FOLKS FROM ONE PLACE TO ANOTHER, BUT AN INDIVIDUAL CHOOSES THE TRANSPORT WHICH OFFERS THEM A AFFORDABLE, PRECIOUS TRAVEL TIME AND ENJOYABLE. THIS CAN ONLY HAPPEN, WHEN THE AUTHORITY SPENDS A MORE CURRANCY ON CONSTRUCTING VERIOUS RAILWAY SYSTEMS THAN ROADS.
IT IS AN EXCELLENT
IDEA
TO RESERVE MONEY ON THE
RAILWAY
PROJECTS BY THE REGIME. THIS ESSAY WILL COMPLETELY CONCUR WITH THE ABOVE NOTION DUE TO THE MAJOR ADVANTAGE OF DEVELOPING
RAILWAYS
THAT
ROADS
.
FIRSTLY
, THIS ESSAY WILL DISCUSS WHY IT IS FUNDAMENTAL TO
SPEND
WEALTH ON THE
RAILWAYS
, AND
SECONDLY
, WHY THE
IDEA
OF
DEVELOPIN
ROADS
IS NOT WORTHY.
WHEN WE
THINK
FROM A PUBLIC POINT OF VIEW,
RAILWAYS
PROVID
A
COMFORATBLE
, AFFORDABLE AND
MAINLY
CHEAPER COMMUTING. THIS GIVE AN ENORMOUS
PROFITS
TO THE
GOVERNMENT
AS IT COSTS A PENNY FOR CONSTRUCTING THE
RAILWAYS
. AND,
PEOPLE
ALSO
CAN ABLE TO
TRAVEL TROUGH
RAILWAYS
DUE TO THE LESS EXPENSIVE TICKETS.
FOR EXAMPLE
, THE UK REGIME DATA OF THE LAST YEAR
SHOWED
THAT 80% TOTAL
EXPENCE
CAME FROM
RAILWAY
AS
MANY
PREFER TO
USE
RAILWAYS
TO SAVE MONEY FOR A MONTH.
ON THE OTHER SIDE, IF THE AUTHORITY
SPEND
THEIR MONEY ON
ROAD
, THEIR ECONOMY NEVER BE
RISED
AS
FAST
AS OTHER DEVELOPED CONTINENTS OWNING THAT IT IS EXPENSIVE TO MAINTAIN A
ROADS
ALL THE COMING YEARS. AS THE AUTHORITY RESPONSIBLE TO FOR BUILDING THE PUBLIC AREAS. IF IT
GOT
DAMAGE, THEM THE REGIME
HAS TO
SPEND
A ALMOST DOUBLED AMOUNT
CURRANCY
TO
REPAR
IT. THIS WOULD RESULT IN A ZERO LEVEL OF PROGRESS
FRON
AN ECONOMIC POINT OF VIEW.
CONSEQUENTLY
, THE TERRITORY WOULD FALL A DECADES BEHIND
IN COMPARISON
TO SUCCESSFUL
TERITORIES
.
IN CONCLUSION
, THE
RAILWAYS
AND THE
ROADD
BOTH THE MEANS OF
TRANSPORTATIN
FACILITIES
INDEED
CARRY FOLKS FROM ONE PLACE TO ANOTHER,
BUT
AN INDIVIDUAL CHOOSES THE TRANSPORT WHICH OFFERS THEM A AFFORDABLE, PRECIOUS TRAVEL TIME AND ENJOYABLE. THIS CAN
ONLY
HAPPEN, WHEN THE AUTHORITY
SPENDS
A MORE
CURRANCY
ON CONSTRUCTING
VERIOUS
RAILWAY
SYSTEMS THAN
ROADS
.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes