It is argued by some people that students should be free to choose what they will study. They think that they should have the chance to stay away from difficult subjects such as mathematics or philosophy. I completely disagree with this opinion for the following reasons.
To begin with, younger people are too focused on fun and entertainment because of their nature. If given the chance, they may not even want to go to school. So, there is no point in asking for their opinion in such cases. Their ideas may be used for designing the school or activities, but the framework must be created by adults, particularly scientists.
In addition, at least a basic understanding mathematics is critical in our age. We deal with numbers in all aspects of modern life, from making investments to setting up a family budget. If we lack sufficient mathematical knowledge as adults, we may be deceived more often than usual. It may be hard to believe, but there are still people who cannot make easy calculations. This is because of skipping math lessons or failing them.
Finally, philosophy may be difficult, but it teaches us to question life properly. We all need to find meaning in life. This is where philosophy steps in. It allows us to compare former beliefs with our own. In the end, we come up with a synthesis and live up to it. For example, many people have found peace in Buddhism although there was not even a single Buddhist around them. This is all thanks to philosophy. So, the earlier students learn about philosophy, the closer they will be to finding meaning in life.
In conclusion, I believe that difficult lessons should be integrated into the curriculum, regardless of the opinion of the students. They will be beneficial in the long run.
It
is argued
by
some
people
that students should be free to choose what they will study. They
think
that they should have the chance to stay away from difficult subjects such as mathematics or
philosophy
. I completely disagree with this opinion for the following reasons.
To
begin
with, younger
people
are too focused on fun and entertainment
because
of their nature. If
given
the chance, they may not even want to go to school.
So
, there is no point in asking for their opinion in such cases. Their
ideas
may be
used
for designing the school or activities,
but
the framework
must
be created
by adults,
particularly
scientists.
In addition
, at least a basic understanding mathematics is critical in our age. We deal with numbers in all aspects of modern life, from making investments to setting up a family budget. If we lack sufficient mathematical knowledge as adults, we may
be deceived
more
often
than usual. It may be
hard
to believe,
but
there are
still
people
who cannot
make
easy calculations. This is
because
of skipping math lessons or failing them.
Finally
,
philosophy
may be difficult,
but
it teaches us to question life
properly
. We all need to find meaning in life. This is where
philosophy
steps in. It
allows
us to compare former beliefs with our
own
. In the
end
, we
come
up with a synthesis and
live
up to it.
For example
,
many
people
have found peace in Buddhism although there was not even a single Buddhist around them. This is all thanks to
philosophy
.
So
, the earlier students learn about
philosophy
, the closer they will be to finding meaning in life.
In conclusion
, I believe that difficult lessons should
be integrated
into the curriculum, regardless of the opinion of the students. They will be beneficial in the long run.