Nowadays, there are various jobs with different amount of wages around the world, but in certain nations, a few people receive a high allowance. Some individuals believe that it is good for the country, while others think that government should limit the amount of people can earn by controlling salaries. This is a will discuss both views before arriving at my opinion.
To begin with, collecting extremely grade wages allowed to support the country by providing a particular amount to the nation's income as tax. In the present decade, people who earn more than a particular amount should be pay to the government as income tax thus, it becomes an asset for the country. For example, individuals who are leading international businesses earns a large amount as wage and they approach the authorities in time to share their income with the nation as per the law.
On the other hand, this type of variation in salaries arises social stratification in society and a limited amount decreases several discrimination. In present days it can notice that society divides family as per the income there that sometimes lead to social inequality. For instance, an individual who possesses more money mighty humiliate low level people with their tried that consequently result in hatred. There for fixing a particular bulk of allowance would be enriched equality among people in some sort.
On the flip side, in my opinion the argument of implementing equal amount of wages enables the society and the country to promote equality in earnings among families. And the government can find money from several other ways.
To conclude, the essay discusses how the high waged people is useful for the country and how stable amount salary for all help the society. And found that both serves a significant role in the country.
Nowadays, there are various jobs with
different
amount
of wages around the world,
but
in certain nations, a few
people
receive a high allowance.
Some
individuals believe that it is
good
for the
country
, while others
think
that
government
should limit the
amount
of
people
can earn by controlling salaries. This is a will discuss both views
before
arriving at my opinion.
To
begin
with, collecting
extremely
grade wages
allowed
to support the
country
by providing a particular
amount
to the nation's
income
as tax. In the present decade,
people
who earn more than a particular
amount
should be pay to the
government
as
income
tax
thus
, it becomes an asset for the
country
.
For example
, individuals who are leading international businesses earns a large
amount
as
wage and
they approach the authorities in time to share their
income
with the nation as per the law.
On the other hand
, this type of variation in salaries arises social stratification in
society
and a limited
amount
decreases
several discrimination
. In present days it can notice that
society
divides family as per the
income
there that
sometimes
lead to social inequality.
For instance
, an individual who possesses more money mighty humiliate low level
people
with their tried that
consequently
result in hatred. There for fixing a particular bulk of allowance would
be enriched
equality among
people
in
some
sort.
On the flip side, in my opinion the argument of implementing equal
amount
of wages enables the
society
and the
country
to promote equality in earnings among families. And the
government
can find money from several other ways.
To conclude
, the essay discusses how the high waged
people
is
useful for the
country
and how stable
amount
salary for all
help
the
society
. And found that both serves a significant role in the
country
.