Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. v.5

Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. v. 5
Switching of jobs is a common trend that we can see in the current generation. While some people say it is good to be with the same company for their entire career as it gives stable living environment, others think it is better to keep switching the organisation for better payment and more exposure to the multiple domains. This essay will discuss how we can achieve better salary and knowledge exposure through company switching. Apparently, working different companies is beneficial in terms of money and knowledge. This is because, those who are switching their job frequently might have the change to get high salary packages from multi-national companies because many companies are looking for experienced candidates. Experienced people can negotiate salary and they would be able to better remuneration. Moreover, these people can also have the exposure to multiple domains because of their experience in different organisations. For example, 90 percentage of IT employees who keeps switching their companies are earning better payments than the employees who sticks in one company. Additionally, Most companies prefer to hire these types of employees because they have the knowledge in multiple areas. Thus, changing companies is good in terms of domain enlightenment and payment. However, a group of people still thinks that it is better to stay in an organisation for their lifetime so that they can have a stable existence. To go into detail, staying in single organisation is less stressful than attending interviews frequently and changing the jobs. Although switching jobs are beneficial for the employee, it stops the people from having a stable living as they need to change their job location frequently. There is no guarantee that we could get a job in the same city. For instance, people who keep changing their companies are less likely to build a house settled. Even though they have capital, they cannot stick into a single city. Due to this their life's equilibrium will get distracted. In conclusion, the job is an important aspect in every individual's life. People who like to earn more in terms of money and proficiency are more likely to switch their jobs. On the other hand, people who like to have a non-stressful non-ambitious life tend to stay within their organisation for their survival time. This essay agreed that changing jobs across different organisations is better for having a joyful living hood because money is the key aspect behind happiness.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Switching
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jobs
is a common trend that we can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
see
in the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
current
generation. While
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
say it is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
to be with the same
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
for their entire career as it gives stable living environment, others
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
it is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
keep
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
switching
the
Possible spelling mistake. 'organisation' is British English.
organisation
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
payment and more exposure to the multiple domains. This essay will discuss how we can achieve
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
salary and knowledge exposure through
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
switching.

Apparently
, working
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
is beneficial in terms of money and knowledge. This is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
, those
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
are
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
switching
their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
frequently
might have the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
high salary packages from multi-national
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
are looking for experienced candidates. Experienced
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
can negotiate
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
salary and
they would be able to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
remuneration.
Moreover
, these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
can
also
have the exposure to multiple domains
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
of their experience in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
Possible spelling mistake. 'organisations' is British English.
organisations
.
For example
, 90 percentage of IT
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
keeps
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
switching
their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
are earning
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
payments than the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
Did you mean "stick"? Alternatively, check whether the singular of 'employees' should be used.
sticks
in one
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
.
Additionally
, Most
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
prefer to hire these types of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
they have the knowledge in multiple areas.
Thus
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
changing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
in terms of domain enlightenment and payment.

However
, a group of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
still
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
thinks
that it is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
to stay in an
Possible spelling mistake. 'organisation' is British English.
organisation
for their lifetime
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
that they can have a stable existence. To go into detail, staying in single
Possible spelling mistake. 'organisation' is British English.
organisation
is less stressful than attending interviews
frequently
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
changing
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jobs
. Although
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
switching
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jobs
are beneficial for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employee
, it
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
stops
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
from having a stable living as they need to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
location
frequently
. There is no guarantee that we could
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
The usual preposition for "get a job" is "with" for an organization. Revise: "with the same".
in the same
city.
For instance
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
keep
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
changing
their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
are less likely to build a
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
house
settled.
Even though
they have capital, they cannot stick into a single city. Due to this their life's equilibrium will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
distracted.

In conclusion
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
job
is an
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
aspect in every individual's life.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
People
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
like to earn more in terms of money and proficiency are more likely to switch their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jobs
.
On the other hand
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
like to have a non-stressful non-ambitious life tend to stay within their
Possible spelling mistake. 'organisation' is British English.
organisation
for their survival time. This essay
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
agreed
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
changing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
jobs
across
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
Possible spelling mistake. 'organisations' is British English.
organisations
is
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
better
for having a joyful living hood
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
money is the key aspect behind happiness.
12Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
53Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
9Mistakes
Speak a new language so that the world will be a new world.
Rumi

IELTS essay Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations. v. 5

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
403 words
6
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts