Recruiting a suitable employee is always a challenge to most companies. During the recruitment process, the company has to take into account the personality and capability of a candidate. While some people prefer to employ a collaborative instruction follower, I would argue that employing an innovative and independent person would be more suitable.
A creative and independent employee is usually an effective problem solver and a challenger. In other words, they are skillful, motivated and enthusiastic in addressing any issues that occur. These employees can quickly come up with ideas and strategies, then put them into practice immediately. From my working experience, these individuals are often valued and promoted by the management. Unlike passive workers who normally respond to instructions, they seem to be a great asset to the organisation.
Conversely, hiring a staff who has a strong sense of collaboration and adherence to instructions ensures fewer mistakes and greater efficiency, especially in larger organisations. These qualities are required at workplaces, for example IT distribution centres, to ensure delivery can be made at the right time and to the right place. All workers work together, follow guidelines and listen to their superiors so that there are few mistakes or conflicts, which improves efficiency. However, a self-reliant and innovative worker is definitely required in any business, be it multinational companies or sole traders. They are more productive. By taking initiative to solve problems and take risks, the administration and management of a company will be improved. Thus, their skills and abilities are undoubtedly needed in any working environment.
In conclusion, I personally think that employing someone who works innovatively and independently is more desirable as they are more proactive and willing to go that extra mile to stimulate personal and workplace development, whicl cooperative staff is appreciated but are not as capable as the former candidate.
Recruiting a suitable employee is always a challenge to most
companies
. During the recruitment process, the
company
has to
take into account the personality and capability of a candidate. While
some
people
prefer to employ a collaborative instruction follower, I would argue that employing an innovative and independent person would be more suitable.
A creative and independent employee is
usually
an effective problem solver and a challenger.
In other words
, they are skillful, motivated and enthusiastic in addressing any issues that occur. These employees can
quickly
come
up with
ideas
and strategies, then put them into practice immediately. From my working experience, these individuals are
often
valued and promoted by the management. Unlike passive workers who
normally
respond to instructions, they seem to be a great asset to the
organisation
.
Conversely
, hiring a staff who has a strong sense of collaboration and adherence to instructions ensures fewer mistakes and greater efficiency,
especially
in larger
organisations
. These qualities
are required
at workplaces,
for example
IT distribution
centres
, to ensure delivery can
be made
at the right time and to the right place. All workers work together, follow guidelines and listen to their superiors
so
that there are few mistakes or conflicts, which
improves
efficiency.
However
, a self-reliant and innovative worker is definitely required in any business, be it multinational
companies
or sole traders. They are more productive. By taking initiative to solve problems and take
risks
, the administration and management of a
company
will be
improved
.
Thus
, their
skills
and abilities are
undoubtedly
needed in any working environment.
In conclusion
, I
personally
think
that employing someone who works
innovatively
and
independently
is more desirable as they are more proactive and willing to go that extra mile to stimulate personal and workplace development,
whicl
cooperative staff
is appreciated
but
are not as capable as the former candidate.