Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions. Discuss both views and give your opinion. v.1

Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions. v. 1
Some people considered that in the recruitment stage, corporations should opt for those people who are having team working and instruction taking skills. However, in my opinion, companies should consider people who are creative and can work without depending on others. Admittedly, team skills are advantageous, as it result in on-time completion of a project. If an employee is able to adapt to working in a team smoothly, it would result in a better planning and deadline of a project, due to more than one mind working simultaneously. The International Economic Institute of London, for example, has reported recently that companies who have workers possessing team working skill, are more efficient in achieving project deadline. Likewise, employees who are flexible in taking instructions are more likely to fostered skills with time, which is positive development for a company. If staff members who are flexible in taking guidance from senior colleague, would flourish, due to the wide experience their senior staff possess. Consequently, they become productive workers for their company. On the other hand, I believe that creativity of an employee bring new ideas to a company. Innovative people put forward their creative thoughts to the company, which boost the corporation performance, as they may end up in developing in some great product or business solutions. A Social Site Facebook, for instance, has recently announced vacancies for “Creative Mind” job title, owing to the fact that they are looking for some uncommon minds to work on their new business plans. Similarly, an employee being able to work without a need of other employees, minimizes the number of workers required in an organization. If an employee can work on a certain task in a project alone, without the help of their colleagues, would result in the less number of skilled man resource requirement, which is, in turn, cost effective for a business. In conclusion, some people argue that while recruiting, corporations should give a priority to those who can work together with their colleagues and are able to take instructions. Whereas, in my view, recruiters ought to take people who possess creativity and can work without assistance, as this is beneficial for a company’s performance and is economical.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
considered that in the recruitment stage, corporations should opt for those
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
are having
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
working
and instruction taking
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
skills
.
However
, in my opinion,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
should consider
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
are creative and can
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
without depending on others.

Admittedly
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
skills
are advantageous, as it result in on-time completion of a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
project
. If an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employee
is able to adapt to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
working
in a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
smoothly
, it would result in a better planning and deadline of a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
project
, due to more than one mind
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
working
simultaneously
. The International Economic Institute of London,
for example
, has reported recently that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
have workers possessing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
team
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
working
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
skill
, are more efficient in achieving
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
project
deadline.
Likewise
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
are flexible in taking instructions are more likely to fostered
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
skills
with time, which is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
positive
development for a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
. If staff members
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
are flexible in taking guidance from senior colleague, would flourish, due to the wide experience their senior staff possess.
Consequently
, they become productive workers for their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
company
.

On the other hand
, I believe that creativity of an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employee
bring new
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
ideas
to a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
. Innovative
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
put forward their creative thoughts to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
, which boost the corporation performance, as they may
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
up
Adverb repetition. Please, verify.
in developing in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
great product or business solutions. A Social Site Facebook,
for instance
, has recently announced vacancies for “Creative Mind” job title, owing to the fact that they are looking for
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
uncommon minds to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
on their new business plans.
Similarly
, an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employee
being able to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
without a need of other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employees
, minimizes the number of workers required in an organization. If an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
employee
can
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
on a certain task in a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
project
alone, without the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
of their colleagues, would result in the less number of skilled
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
man
resource requirement, which is, in turn, cost effective for a business.

In conclusion
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
argue that while recruiting, corporations should give a priority to those
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
can
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
together with their colleagues and are able to take instructions. Whereas, in my view, recruiters ought to take
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
possess creativity and can
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
work
without assistance, as this is beneficial for a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company’s
performance and is economical.
9Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
47Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes
We should learn languages because language is the only thing worth knowing even poorly.
Kató Lomb

IELTS essay Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions. v. 1

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
366 words
6
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts