In many nations, few individuals are of view that it is imperative to use a significant amount of cash on modern innovations in railways, for better transportation services that links urban centres, while others are convinced that the money should be apportioned in an already established means of transportation. Both sides of these arguments will be placed under careful scrutiny in this essay. In my opinion, it is certainly advantageous to allocate government funding on advanced equipments.
On the one hand, the generation today is reaping the benefits of technological breakthroughs that offers convenience in everyday living. So in order for this tremendous opportunity not to go to waste, people will have to make the most out of it, especially in aspects of transportation. For instance, since a significant portion of the general population uses public transportation, it should be the priority of the governing body to upgrade this sector. On such ground, the travel time requirement to go to different city centres will be greatly reduced, thereby improving everyone's lifestyle in the country.
On the other hand, some people believe that financial disbursements should lean towards improvement of the facilities that are already in place. This is logical in the sense that certain additions would just need to be identified and implemented; however, it will eventually be a huge waste of money because those machines are already outdated and will soon need to be replaced. For example, if a 1998 model train is scheduled for a costly maintenance check, then the proposal to just replace it with a brand-new model is certainly more practical. In that sense, I concur that it is better to invest state funds in up to date means of transportation.
To summarize, I certainly acknowledge the perspective of allocating the budget for a total upgrade of transportation system in the metropolis because it provides convenience and practicality in the long run. 
In  
many
 nations, few individuals are of view that it is imperative to  
use
 a significant amount of cash on modern innovations in railways, for better  
transportation
 services that links urban  
centres
, while others  
are convinced
 that the money should  
be apportioned
 in an already established means of  
transportation
. Both sides of these arguments will  
be placed
 under careful scrutiny in this essay. In my opinion, it is  
certainly
 advantageous to allocate  
government
 funding on advanced equipments.
On the one hand, the generation  
today
 is reaping the benefits of technological breakthroughs that offers convenience in everyday living.  
So
 in order for this tremendous opportunity not to go to waste,  
people
 will  
have to
  make
 the most out of it,  
especially
 in aspects of  
transportation
.  
For instance
, since a significant portion of the general population  
uses
 public  
transportation
, it should be the priority of the governing body to upgrade this sector. On such ground, the travel time requirement to go to  
different
 city  
centres
 will be  
greatly
  reduced
, thereby improving everyone's lifestyle in the country. 
On the other hand
,  
some
  people
 believe that financial disbursements should lean towards improvement of the facilities that are already in place. This is logical in the sense that certain additions would  
just
 need to  
be identified
 and implemented;  
however
, it will  
eventually
 be a huge waste of money  
because
 those machines are already outdated and will  
soon
 need to  
be replaced
.  
For example
, if a 1998 model train  
is scheduled
 for a costly maintenance  
check
, then the proposal to  
just
 replace it with a brand-new model is  
certainly
 more practical. In that sense, I concur that it is better to invest state funds in up to date means of transportation. 
To summarize
, I  
certainly
 acknowledge the perspective of allocating the budget for a total upgrade of  
transportation
 system in the metropolis  
because
 it provides convenience and practicality in the long run.