In many nations, few individuals are of view that it is imperative to use a significant amount of cash on modern innovations in railways, for better transportation services that links urban centres, while others are convinced that the money should be apportioned in an already established means of transportation. Both sides of these arguments will be placed under careful scrutiny in this essay. In my opinion, it is certainly advantageous to allocate government funding on advanced equipments.
On the one hand, the generation today is reaping the benefits of technological breakthroughs that offers convenience in everyday living. So in order for this tremendous opportunity not to go to waste, people will have to make the most out of it, especially in aspects of transportation. For instance, since a significant portion of the general population uses public transportation, it should be the priority of the governing body to upgrade this sector. On such ground, the travel time requirement to go to different city centres will be greatly reduced, thereby improving everyone's lifestyle in the country.
On the other hand, some people believe that financial disbursements should lean towards improvement of the facilities that are already in place. This is logical in the sense that certain additions would just need to be identified and implemented; however, it will eventually be a huge waste of money because those machines are already outdated and will soon need to be replaced. For example, if a 1998 model train is scheduled for a costly maintenance check, then the proposal to just replace it with a brand-new model is certainly more practical. In that sense, I concur that it is better to invest state funds in up to date means of transportation.
To summarize, I certainly acknowledge the perspective of allocating the budget for a total upgrade of transportation system in the metropolis because it provides convenience and practicality in the long run.
In
many
nations, few individuals are of view that it is imperative to
use
a significant amount of cash on modern innovations in railways, for better
transportation
services that links urban
centres
, while others
are convinced
that the money should
be apportioned
in an already established means of
transportation
. Both sides of these arguments will
be placed
under careful scrutiny in this essay. In my opinion, it is
certainly
advantageous to allocate
government
funding on advanced equipments.
On the one hand, the generation
today
is reaping the benefits of technological breakthroughs that offers convenience in everyday living.
So
in order for this tremendous opportunity not to go to waste,
people
will
have to
make
the most out of it,
especially
in aspects of
transportation
.
For instance
, since a significant portion of the general population
uses
public
transportation
, it should be the priority of the governing body to upgrade this sector. On such ground, the travel time requirement to go to
different
city
centres
will be
greatly
reduced
, thereby improving everyone's lifestyle in the country.
On the other hand
,
some
people
believe that financial disbursements should lean towards improvement of the facilities that are already in place. This is logical in the sense that certain additions would
just
need to
be identified
and implemented;
however
, it will
eventually
be a huge waste of money
because
those machines are already outdated and will
soon
need to
be replaced
.
For example
, if a 1998 model train
is scheduled
for a costly maintenance
check
, then the proposal to
just
replace it with a brand-new model is
certainly
more practical. In that sense, I concur that it is better to invest state funds in up to date means of transportation.
To summarize
, I
certainly
acknowledge the perspective of allocating the budget for a total upgrade of
transportation
system in the metropolis
because
it provides convenience and practicality in the long run.