It is unfortunately the case that in any society we can find a number of people who do not respect to the social rights of others. One of the most disturbing cases is making noise either in public or people's private life. While the majority of people believe that the amount of noise produced by individuals must be restricted, there are still people who think that they have freedom to make noise regardless of considering other's life. In this essay, I will explain my point of view by examining both sides of the argument.
Some people think that they should not take any responsibility related to limiting or decreasing the noise made by them. They claim that controlling the amount of the noise by rules and regulations not only invades their personal privacy, but it violates their social freedom. For example, in their view, listening to music loudly or hosting night parties in their own apartments would be considered as their basic human rights of being happy.
There is, however, a strong argument that it is the responsibility of all members of a society to respect others' social life. Most people object to disrupting other's life by making unlimited noises. They believe that making noise should be controlled as much as possible when it creates disturbance for others by regulating strict rules. A common example here is to prohibit talking over cell phones loudly in the public such as in a subway which is clearly creating disturbance for people who are near the person while it has been frequently happening.
In my view, any type of activity that creates disturbance for citizens' life must be controlled, and noise is no exception. Although it is beyond the power of governments to control all disturbing noises in the whole society, it seems to be possible that making some avoidable noises is banned in certain places such as near hospitals.
It is unfortunately the case that in any society we can find a number of
people
who do not respect to the social rights of others. One of the most disturbing cases is making
noise
either in public or
people
's private
life
. While the majority of
people
believe that the amount of
noise
produced by individuals
must
be restricted
, there are
still
people
who
think
that they have freedom to
make
noise
regardless of considering other's
life
. In this essay, I will
explain
my point of view by examining both sides of the argument.
Some
people
think
that they should not take any responsibility related to limiting or decreasing the
noise
made by them. They claim that controlling the amount of the
noise
by
rules
and regulations not
only
invades their personal privacy,
but
it violates their social freedom.
For example
, in their view, listening to music
loudly
or hosting night parties in their
own
apartments would
be considered
as their basic human rights of being happy.
There is,
however
, a strong argument that it is the responsibility of all members of a society to respect others' social
life
. Most
people
object to disrupting other's
life
by making unlimited
noises
. They believe that making
noise
should
be controlled
as much as possible when it creates disturbance for others by regulating strict
rules
. A common example here is to prohibit talking over cell phones
loudly
in the public such as in a subway which is
clearly
creating disturbance for
people
who are near the person while it has been
frequently
happening.
In my view, any type of activity that creates disturbance for citizens'
life
must
be controlled
, and
noise
is no exception. Although it is beyond the power of
governments
to control all disturbing
noises
in the whole society, it seems to be possible that making
some
avoidable
noises
is banned
in certain places such as near hospitals.