Many commentators believe that the media possess the right to publicize an individual’s personal life. In contrast, others would argue that this authority should be limited. Both these schools of thought hold valid arguments, which will be discussed before a personal stance being presented.
Indisputably, the media such as radio, TV channels, the internet and especially newspapers, are a powerful tool to confront facts and figures associated with celebrities. Exposure of well-known people’s other faces, particularly artists and politicians, can serve the public to comprehend the truth behind their words and performances. Since these facts are brought to light, the public shall have the opportunity to confirm whether celebrities are worthy of supporting or not. For example, the personal lives of political leaders such as Donald Trump can be crucial criteria that reveal how loyal they are to their slogans.
On the other hand, opponents may believe that public personalities also have intimate details that must not be interfered with for people to gossip. It is a human right for everyone to have private information kept confidential. Therefore, invading public figures’ privacy shall be against their will, and it shall indeed violate the law of privacy. Besides, in many cases, free publicity of private details may lead to insecurity in their lives as well as have detrimental effects on their career.
All things considered, although publishing the personal lives of individuals may have some positive benefits, it also adversely affects the privacy of public figures. Given that, governments and individuals should make a collective effort to impose regulations on the media in order to protect people’s private life.
Many
commentators believe that the media possess the right to publicize an individual’s
personal
life.
In contrast
, others would argue that this authority should
be limited
. Both these schools of
thought
hold valid arguments, which will
be discussed
before
a
personal
stance
being presented
.
Indisputably
, the media such as radio, TV channels, the internet and
especially
newspapers, are a powerful tool to confront facts and figures associated with celebrities. Exposure of well-known
people
’s other faces,
particularly
artists and politicians, can serve the
public
to comprehend the truth behind their words and performances. Since these facts
are brought
to light, the
public
shall have the opportunity to confirm whether celebrities are worthy of supporting or not.
For example
, the
personal
lives
of political leaders such as Donald Trump can be crucial criteria that reveal how loyal they are to their slogans.
On the other hand
, opponents may believe that
public
personalities
also
have intimate
details
that
must
not
be interfered
with for
people
to gossip. It is a human right for everyone to have private information
kept
confidential.
Therefore
, invading
public
figures’ privacy shall be against their will, and it shall
indeed
violate the law of privacy.
Besides
, in
many
cases, free publicity of private
details
may lead to insecurity in their
lives
as well
as have detrimental effects on their career.
All things considered, although publishing the
personal
lives
of individuals may have
some
positive
benefits, it
also
adversely
affects the privacy of
public
figures.
Given
that,
governments
and individuals should
make
a collective effort to impose regulations on the media in order to protect
people
’s private life.