Some people think that the media newspapers have the right to publish details of people s private life while other s think it should be controlled Discuss both views v.2
Some people think that the media newspapers have the right to publish details of people s private life while other s think it should be controlled 2
Media is increasingly interfering in private life of people’s. Many people think that they have the right to make public personal life of people while some feel that it should be limited. This essay will discuss both viewpoints of this controversial issue.
There are a growing number of people’s who think that it is acceptable if media (newspapers) publish things about people’s life. They believe that their life is owned by the media and they are obliged to tell every detail of their personal life to them. Moreover, they think that it is the media who has made people’s life worth to be read by other people. For example, media publishes the detail of each and every aspect of celebrities life whether it is a marriage function or someone’s cremation. Thus, for media getting into details of someone’s life has become a priority.
In contrast, there are some people who think that media’s interference should be limited in people’s life. The reason being, everybody has right to privacy which should not be tampered by any means. Furthermore, they feel that if details of someone’s personal life are publicized by media then people judge them. Professors in a university, for instance, claimed that students become conscious if their final project details are leaked before demonstration and ultimately, they try to change it as much as possible to make it perfect. Therefore, media should feel responsible about what to publish about personal lives of people.
In conclusion, what to publish and what not to publish has become a heated debate among people all over the world. This essay discussed whether media should publish about people’s personal life or it should be controlled.
Media
is
increasingly
interfering in private
life
of
people’s
.
Many
people
think
that they have the right to
make
public
personal
life
of
people
while
some
feel that it should
be limited
. This essay will discuss both viewpoints of this controversial issue.
There are a growing number of
people’s
who
think
that it is acceptable if
media
(newspapers)
publish
things about
people’s
life
. They believe that their
life
is
owned
by the
media and
they
are obliged
to
tell
every
detail
of their
personal
life
to them.
Moreover
, they
think
that it is the
media
who
has
made
people’s
life
worth to
be read
by other
people
.
For example
,
media
publishes
the
detail
of each and every aspect of celebrities
life
whether it is a marriage function or someone’s cremation.
Thus
, for
media
getting into
details
of someone’s
life
has become a priority.
In contrast
, there are
some
people
who
think
that
media’s
interference should
be limited
in
people’s
life
. The reason being, everybody has right to privacy which should not
be tampered
by any means.
Furthermore
, they feel that if
details
of someone’s
personal
life
are publicized
by
media
then
people
judge them. Professors in a university,
for instance
, claimed that students become conscious if their final project
details
are leaked
before
demonstration and
ultimately
, they try to
change
it as much as possible to
make
it perfect.
Therefore
,
media
should feel responsible about what to
publish
about
personal
lives
of
people
.
In conclusion
, what to
publish
and what not to
publish
has become a heated debate among
people
all over the world. This essay discussed whether
media
should
publish
about
people’s
personal
life
or it should
be controlled
.
9Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
53Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
3Mistakes