Defense system plays an important role in public, because it protects human right. Therefore, some politicians think that more of the budget should be allocated to it, but less to the advantages of society. This essay disagrees with their opinion.
Let us start with reasons why some politicians argue that the public authority should spend more of the budget on military regardless of public benefits. The first reason is that it ensures safety. Many people complain that the crime rate has increased lately, so the government should hire more police officers to secure the order of law. Another reason is that it can give the ability to stop any attempt of external invasion. Governments should satisfy military needs, including purchase of tanks and planes as well as support an enough number of soldiers to repel any attack, shostile neighbors may cross the border and invade. Furthermore, it allows the government to sell weapons. Funding military needs can also provide another source of financing the budget, because many countries are willing to buy different types of weapon abroad.
However, some sociologists believe that the government should focus more on the demands of society than on those of military. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, it enables to open more workplaces. The government should concentrate on the economy rather than on the army, as many people face unemployment and seek jobs to support their families. Secondly, it secures the provision of better health care. The money spent on weapons could go to bring the condition of hospitals to the world standards. In addition, it lets to improve the quality of education. The government could both build more schools and recruit more teachers, so that they can supply labor market with high-qualified graduates.
In conclusion, even though some politicians state that the authorities should give more money to protection at the expense of public programs, I think that social needs are a higher priority.
Defense system plays an
important
role in
public
,
because
it protects human right.
Therefore
,
some
politicians
think
that more of the budget should
be allocated
to it,
but
less to the advantages of society. This essay disagrees with their opinion.
Let
us
start
with reasons why
some
politicians argue that the
public
authority should spend more of the budget on military regardless of
public
benefits. The
first
reason is that it ensures safety.
Many
people
complain that the crime rate has increased lately,
so
the
government
should hire more police officers to secure the order of law. Another reason is that it can give the ability to
stop
any attempt of external invasion.
Governments
should satisfy military needs, including
purchase
of tanks and
planes
as well
as support an
enough
number of soldiers to repel any attack,
shostile
neighbors may cross the border and invade.
Furthermore
, it
allows
the
government
to sell weapons. Funding military needs can
also
provide another source of financing the budget,
because
many
countries are willing to
buy
different
types of weapon abroad.
However
,
some
sociologists believe that the
government
should focus more on the demands of society than on those of military. They justify their opinion with the following arguments.
Firstly
, it enables to open more workplaces. The
government
should concentrate on the economy
rather
than on the army, as
many
people
face unemployment and seek jobs to support their families.
Secondly
, it secures the provision of better health care. The money spent on weapons could go to bring the condition of hospitals to the world standards.
In addition
, it
lets
to
improve
the quality of education. The
government
could both build more schools and recruit more teachers,
so
that they can supply labor market with high-qualified graduates.
In conclusion
,
even though
some
politicians state that the authorities should give more money to protection at the expense of
public
programs, I
think
that social needs are a higher priority.