Some people think that the fictional violence portrayed on television is harmless entertainment. Others disagree and think that it encourages violent behaviour. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. v.1
Some people think that the fictional violence portrayed on television is harmless entertainment. Others disagree and think that it encourages violent behaviour. v. 1
It is argued by some people that the most important way to solve traffic congestion and pollution is to increase the price of fuel. I agree with this notion because a fuel hike would make the daily use of personal cars on roads unattractive, while the development of public transportation system is another effective way to solve this problem.
First of all, a higher cost of fuel would make the daily use of automobiles unattractive. This would be due to the exorbitant cost of maintaining personal cars. Thus, people would seek alternative means of transit, reducing the numbers of cars on roads as well as noise and exhaust from them. For example, following the hike in the pump price of petrol in Nigeria, in 2012, many car owners left their cars at home, reducing the number of vehicles on major roads, transit time, noise and exhaust from cars. Thus, a hike in the cost of gasoline would result in less traffic jams and pollutions from vehicles.
Furthermore, the government should develop a good public transportation system in order to reduce problems on the roads. Through an effective public transportation scheme, many people would forgo the use of personal cars for modes of transportation such as underground trains, bicycles and energy efficient buses. The resultant effects would be less pressure on roads, faster flow of traffic and less pollution of the environment.
In conclusion, fuel hike would discourage the daily use of personal cars and it is an essential approach to reducing traffic and pollutants from vehicles. More so, I believe that a good public transportation scheme would also be effective in running traffic on roads along with pollution.
It
is argued
by
some
people
that the most
important
way to solve
traffic
congestion and
pollution
is to increase the price of
fuel
. I
agree
with this notion
because
a
fuel
hike
would
make
the daily
use
of
personal
cars
on
roads
unattractive, while the development of
public
transportation
system is another effective way to solve this problem.
First of all
, a higher cost of
fuel
would
make
the daily
use
of automobiles unattractive. This would be due to the exorbitant cost of maintaining
personal
cars
.
Thus
,
people
would seek alternative means of transit, reducing the numbers of
cars
on
roads
as well
as noise and exhaust from them.
For example
, following the
hike
in the pump price of petrol in Nigeria, in 2012,
many
car
owners
left
their
cars
at home, reducing the number of vehicles on major
roads
, transit time, noise and exhaust from
cars
.
Thus
, a
hike
in the cost of gasoline would result in less
traffic
jams and
pollutions
from vehicles.
Furthermore
, the
government
should develop a
good
public
transportation
system in order to
reduce
problems on the
roads
. Through an effective
public
transportation
scheme,
many
people
would forgo the
use
of
personal
cars
for modes of
transportation
such as underground trains, bicycles and energy efficient buses. The resultant effects would be less pressure on
roads
, faster flow of
traffic
and less
pollution
of the environment.
In conclusion
,
fuel
hike
would discourage the daily
use
of
personal
cars
and it is an essential approach to reducing
traffic
and pollutants from vehicles. More
so
, I believe that a
good
public
transportation
scheme would
also
be effective in running
traffic
on
roads
along with
pollution
.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes