Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think that the effective way to reduce air pollution is to tax companies which cause it Others think that there are better ways to achieve it Discuss both views and give your opinion v.1

Some people think that the effective way to reduce air pollution is to tax companies which cause it Others think that there are better ways to achieve it 1
Ecological hazards are too big to be managed by an individual group or society. Presently, some people are of the opinion that imposing tax on the companies is the most reliable way to curtail air contamination. By contrast, others have conflicting views. Here, I would like to account for both sides with my own perception. There are manifold points to shore up the former view. First and foremost, companies are expected to use eco friendly energy sources if they are charged for the amount of pollution caused during manufacturing. To illustrate, corporates will definitely look for alternative or auto renewable fuels such as C. N. G, wind power, solar energy and bio gas in order to prevent from heavy levy. Companies may avert the excessive usage of petrol, diesel and wood that result into a high volume of air pollution. Besides this, the efficient usage of fuels and energy efficient machines may come into existence as a part of strategy to control air pollution. Thus, the level of air pollution is likely to plunge under the implementation of tax. On the contrary, opposite wind is also there. Numerous points can be mentioned to endorse the latter view. Initially, nowadays, a remarkable contribution in the rise of air pollution is made by private cars and other vehicles. Therefore, people must avoid the excessive usage of private vehicles, instead should prefer to use public transport. What is more, discouraging deforestation, excessive consumerism and the usage of non biodegradable things could be lucrative to restrain this issue. From my notion, both aspects have their own significance. Undeniably, taxing commercial sectors can play a key role to diminish air contamination. However, the importance of other alternatives cannot be underestimated. It is advisable for both people and companies to share joint responsibilities to take over this worrying concern. To recapitulate, air pollution has become a global menace in this fast paced world. Thus, proactive steps ought to be taken to ' nip this evil in the bed' .
Ecological hazards are too
big
to
be managed
by an individual group or society.
Presently
,
some
people
are of the opinion that imposing tax on the
companies
is the most reliable way to curtail
air
contamination. By contrast, others have conflicting views. Here, I would like to account for both sides with my
own
perception.

There are manifold points to shore up the former view.
First
and foremost,
companies
are
expected
to
use
eco friendly
energy sources if they
are charged
for the amount of
pollution
caused during manufacturing. To illustrate,
corporates
will definitely look for alternative or auto renewable fuels such as C. N. G, wind power, solar energy and
bio gas
in order to
prevent
from heavy levy.
Companies
may avert the excessive
usage
of petrol, diesel and wood that result into a high volume of
air
pollution
.
Besides
this, the efficient
usage
of fuels and energy efficient machines may
come
into existence as a part of strategy to control
air
pollution
.
Thus
, the level of
air
pollution
is likely to plunge under the implementation of tax.
On the contrary
, opposite wind is
also
there.

Numerous points can
be mentioned
to endorse the latter view.
Initially
, nowadays, a remarkable contribution in the rise of
air
pollution
is made
by private cars and other vehicles.
Therefore
,
people
must
avoid the excessive
usage
of private vehicles,
instead
should prefer to
use
public transport.
What is more
, discouraging deforestation, excessive consumerism and the
usage
of
non biodegradable
things could be lucrative to restrain this issue.

From my notion, both aspects have their
own
significance.
Undeniably
, taxing commercial sectors can play a key role to diminish
air
contamination.
However
, the importance of other alternatives cannot
be underestimated
. It is advisable for both
people
and
companies
to share joint responsibilities to take over this worrying concern.

To recapitulate,
air
pollution
has become a global menace in this
fast
paced world.
Thus
, proactive steps ought to
be taken
to ' nip this evil in the
bed&
#039;
.
11Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
21Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
6Mistakes

IELTS essay Some people think that the effective way to reduce air pollution is to tax companies which cause it Others think that there are better ways to achieve it 1

Essay
  American English
5 paragraphs
333 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts