This is a topic which provokes great debate amongst people and enterprises due to its importance and impact on the environment. Whilst some argue that high taxation to companies could mitigate the issue, there is a different school of thought which believes that to address industrial pollution, other measures need to take into account. However, in my opinion, I agree with the idea that high tax could be an effective solution.
To begin with, industrial wastes are one of the major contributors to pollution. Unpurified wastewater, toxic gas, noise and light contaminating environment all day long. Ordinary people are almost unable to go against this as most of the industries are owned by powerful individuals, who are backed by the government most of the times. For instance, despite workers boycotts and protests many companies keep running their factories in developing countries. In fact, these factories provide employment to locals, consequently, minimizing the government' s intervention. Therefore, to control this, policymakers should introduce hefty taxation when starting factories and further, they should make filtration mechanisms mandatory before granting approvals for establishment.
On the other hand, to handle such monopolised, and highly economically-impactful issues, there is very less common people could do. Moreover, even police and local authorities are controlled by these powerful enterprises. Bribery and corrupted systems in most developing nations would not allow people to voice-up. If people take actions against them there is a certain risk of them losing jobs. As a matter of fact, corrupted politicians preventing people' s actions against such industries. Therefore, without the government' s support tackling this issue would be inconceivable.
In conclusion, in my opinion, it would be impossible to handle this issue without heavy tax and policies because other actions which people could take are extremely limited.
This is a topic which provokes great debate amongst
people
and enterprises due to its importance and impact on the environment. Whilst
some
argue that high taxation to
companies
could mitigate the
issue
, there is a
different
school of
thought
which believes that to address industrial pollution, other measures need to take into account.
However
, in my opinion, I
agree
with the
idea
that high tax could be an effective solution.
To
begin
with, industrial wastes are one of the major contributors to pollution.
Unpurified
wastewater, toxic gas, noise and light contaminating environment all day long. Ordinary
people
are almost unable to go against this as most of the industries are
owned
by powerful individuals, who
are backed
by the
government
most of the times
.
For instance
, despite workers boycotts and protests
many
companies
keep
running their factories in
developing countries
. In fact, these factories provide employment to locals,
consequently
, minimizing the
government&
#039; s intervention.
Therefore
, to control this, policymakers should introduce hefty taxation when starting factories and
further
, they should
make
filtration mechanisms mandatory
before
granting approvals for establishment.
On the other hand
, to handle such
monopolised
, and
highly
economically
-impactful
issues
, there is
very
less common
people
could do.
Moreover
, even police and local authorities
are controlled
by these powerful enterprises. Bribery and corrupted systems in most developing nations would not
allow
people
to voice-up.
If
people
take actions against them there is a certain
risk
of them losing jobs. As a matter of fact, corrupted politicians preventing
people&
#039; s actions against such industries.
Therefore
, without the
government&
#039; s support tackling this
issue
would be inconceivable.
In conclusion
, in my opinion, it would be impossible to handle this
issue
without heavy tax and policies
because
other actions which
people
could take are
extremely
limited.