As the global environmental problems have been aggravating over recent years, some analysts opine that exaggerating the price of fuel would be the appropriate solution. However, in my opinion, I would dissent to this notion because other solutions would be more effective regarding this crisis.
To commence with, it is undeniable that fuel price impacts on the cost of other essential commodities. One good illustration of this is that when the fuel rate of the global market rises rapidly, the price of local products automatically follows an upward trend. Eventually, it will be an extreme burden for the impoverished as well as middle-class families.
Secondly, other reasons such as industrial and chemical wastage, solid wastage, electronic wastage, and household wastage are also responsible for the global environmental disaster. The main reasons behind these issues are uncontrolled industrialization, imprudent human activities and so on. Therefore, the authority should more focus on these complications particularly rather than abating the fuel rate.
However, it is evident that exacerbating the cost of fuel will be efficacious to mitigate the threat of global environmental dangers. because it will decline the number of car ownership. As a result, carbon dioxide gas or other dangerous gases that are responsible for poor air quality will be alleviated potentially. Nonetheless, this endeavor would be beneficial only for developing countries where the citizen from developed countries will be able to somehow manage to overcome this.
In conclusion, expanding the cost of fuel will be a helpful initiative to solve the global environmental crisis only for particular cases but, the government should prioritize the real causes of global environmental problems more precisely.
As the
global
environmental
problems have been aggravating over recent years,
some
analysts opine that exaggerating the price of
fuel
would be the appropriate solution.
However
, in my opinion, I would dissent to this notion
because
other
solutions would be more effective regarding this crisis.
To commence with, it is undeniable that
fuel
price impacts on the cost of
other
essential commodities. One
good
illustration of this is that when the
fuel
rate of the
global
market rises
rapidly
, the price of local products
automatically
follows an upward trend.
Eventually
, it will be an extreme burden for the impoverished
as well
as middle-
class
families.
Secondly
,
other
reasons such as industrial and chemical
wastage
, solid
wastage
, electronic
wastage
, and household
wastage
are
also
responsible for the
global
environmental
disaster. The main reasons behind these issues
are uncontrolled
industrialization, imprudent human activities and
so
on.
Therefore
, the authority should more focus on these complications
particularly
rather
than abating the
fuel
rate.
However
, it is evident that exacerbating the cost of
fuel
will be efficacious to mitigate the threat of
global
environmental
dangers
.
because
it will decline the number of car ownership.
As a result
, carbon dioxide gas or
other
dangerous
gases that are responsible for poor air quality will
be alleviated
potentially
. Nonetheless, this endeavor would be beneficial
only
for
developing countries
where the citizen from
developed countries
will be able to somehow manage to overcome this.
In conclusion
, expanding the cost of
fuel
will be a helpful initiative to solve the
global
environmental
crisis
only
for particular cases
but
, the
government
should prioritize the real causes of
global
environmental
problems more
precisely
.