Some people think that secondary school children should study international news as one of the school subjects. Other people think that it is a waste of valuable school time. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. v.3
Some people think that secondary school children should study international news as one of the school subjects. Other people think that it is a waste of valuable school time. v. 3
The importance of global media appears to increase year after year, so much so there have been calls to introduce news channels into the classroom. I believe this to be politically dangerous and potentially damaging due to the nature of international media.
Firstly, considering the importance education has in a modern society, it is extremely worrying and dangerous to even consider substituting school subjects with international news. This is because the danger lies in choosing a correct, balanced, unbiased and neutral news source, if one even exists. For example, if a child spent their school days watching FOX NEWS, they would potentially have a skewed opinion of the world due to its unabashed right-wing credentials. Therefore, changing a child’s information diet from traditional subjects such as music, PE, or geography to watching a potentially partisan news channel is an extremely worrying and risky idea.
Secondly, if international news were to become a new subject it could have a detrimental emotional impact on young minds. This is because in general the majority of news is of a negative nature, hence the expression, “If it bleeds, it leads”. For example, studies by the EFE News Agency show that 85% of headlines are negative in nature, usually referring to natural disasters, war, famine, etc. The logic of having these types of stories beamed into a school to those of an impressionable age has to be challenged. Thus the obligation of watching news of a negative nature makes for a convincing argument against such an innovation.
To conclude, due to the risk from political influences and the harsh reality of global news, I am strongly in favour of maintaining the current curriculum.
The importance of global media appears to increase year after year,
so
much
so
there have been calls to introduce
news
channels into the classroom. I believe this to be
politically
dangerous
and
potentially
damaging due to the
nature
of international media.
Firstly
, considering the importance education has in a modern society, it is
extremely
worrying and
dangerous
to even consider substituting school subjects with international
news
. This is
because
the
danger
lies in choosing a correct, balanced, unbiased and neutral
news
source, if one even exists.
For example
, if a child spent their school days watching FOX
NEWS
, they would
potentially
have a skewed opinion of the world due to its unabashed right-wing credentials.
Therefore
, changing a child’s information diet from traditional subjects such as music, PE, or geography to watching a
potentially
partisan
news
channel is an
extremely
worrying and risky
idea
.
Secondly
, if international
news
were to become a
new
subject it could have a detrimental emotional impact on young minds. This is
because
in general
the majority of
news
is of a
negative
nature
,
hence
the expression, “If it bleeds, it leads”.
For example
, studies by the
EFE
News
Agency
show
that 85% of headlines are
negative
in
nature
,
usually
referring to natural disasters, war, famine, etc. The logic of having these types of stories beamed into a school to those of an impressionable age
has to
be challenged
.
Thus
the obligation of watching
news
of a
negative
nature
makes
for a convincing argument against such an innovation.
To conclude
, due to the
risk
from political influences and the harsh reality of global
news
, I am
strongly
in
favour
of maintaining the
current
curriculum.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8Mistakes