There is an issue about the severity of penalty for immature offenders. Some prosecutors believe that court should assign them adult punishment. This essay disagrees with their point of view.
Let us start with reasons why some prosecutors state young offenders should be sentenced as grownups. The first reason is that it will deter young people from breaking a law. Most children will think carefully before committing crimes, such as pickpocketing and robbing, because court will sentence them as severely as adults. Another reason is that more victims will be content with the verdict. The people, who suffer the crime, will find justice, when the jury punish their offenders with no excuse for their age. Furthermore, it will spare much time and effort for the court. Court will no longer spend much time considering special cases involving children as criminals, since it will judge them as usually as adults criminals.
However, some social workers advocate that youngsters should not receive the punishments intended for adults. Firstly, juvenile delinquents will learn more heavy crimes in prison. The imprisonment of teenagers means that they will rub shoulders with serious criminals, so they will acquire more offensive skills and, subsequently, become more dangerous to society later. Secondly, it will ruin the future of children. Many juvenile offenders will be unable to finish their education and, consequently, get employment, so they will have to make a living by breaking a law again. Moreover, young offenders normally are unaware of justice system. Many children do not know when they commit a crime as well as what will happen to them, if they perpetrate an offence, so it is unfair to assign them the same penalty as adults.
In conclusion, although some prosecutors suggest using the same penalties against teenage criminals as against grownups, I think that soft punishment should be in use against them.
There is an issue about the severity of penalty for immature
offenders
.
Some
prosecutors believe that
court
should assign them adult punishment. This essay disagrees with their point of view.
Let
us
start
with reasons why
some
prosecutors state young
offenders
should
be sentenced
as grownups. The
first
reason is that it will deter young
people
from breaking a law. Most
children
will
think
carefully
before
committing
crimes
, such as
pickpocketing
and robbing,
because
court
will sentence them as
severely
as
adults
. Another reason is that more victims will be content with the verdict. The
people
, who suffer the
crime
, will find justice, when the jury punish their
offenders
with no excuse for their age.
Furthermore
, it will spare much time and effort for the
court
.
Court
will no longer spend much time considering special cases involving
children
as criminals, since it will judge them as
usually
as
adults
criminals.
However
,
some
social workers advocate that youngsters should not receive the punishments intended for
adults
.
Firstly
, juvenile delinquents will learn more heavy
crimes
in prison. The imprisonment of
teenagers
means that they will rub shoulders with serious criminals,
so
they will acquire more offensive
skills
and,
subsequently
, become more
dangerous
to society later.
Secondly
, it will ruin the future of
children
.
Many
juvenile
offenders
will be unable to finish their education and,
consequently
,
get
employment,
so
they will
have to
make
a living by breaking a law again.
Moreover
, young
offenders
normally
are unaware of justice system.
Many
children
do not know when they commit a
crime
as well
as what will happen to them, if they perpetrate an
offence
,
so
it is unfair to assign them the same penalty as adults.
In conclusion
, although
some
prosecutors suggest using the same penalties against teenage criminals as against grownups, I
think
that soft punishment should be in
use
against them.