Nowadays, in some nation the amount of juvenile crime is increasing. There is an opinion that adolescents committing severe offences should be sentenced on the same basis as matured criminals. I somehow agree with the notion because justice must be objective.
First, I am convinced that children under the age of majority who committed severe crime as intentional homicide or torture should be ready to serve the same amount of time in jail as adult offenders. This is because teenagers should be aware that justice will be served and in case of a major crime, they will not have any advantages due to their age. Thus, it will act as a deterrent for the youth and discourage them from commitment of a felony. As well as this, it will be right to sentence an adolescent for a shorter jail term because released criminals tend to commit a new offense just after dismission.
However, those cases, which are involved mature criminals who may force a child to break a law, should be assisted with a great deliberation due to the reason that a teenager may be a victim in spite the fact of committing an offence. For instance, an adult offender may threaten to a younger person by different violent acts in case if they will not obey and refuse to perpetrate an offence. Consequently, in this kind of cases jury or a judge should take into account the age of a convicted person.
In conclusion, I believe that major crimes should be sentenced equally despite the age of a criminal. Meanwhile, juridical system should consider if a person under the age majority was involved into a crime by force or not.
Nowadays, in
some
nation the amount of juvenile
crime
is increasing. There is an opinion that adolescents committing severe
offences
should
be sentenced
on the same basis as matured
criminals
. I somehow
agree
with the notion
because
justice
must
be objective.
First
, I
am convinced
that children under the
age
of majority who committed severe
crime
as intentional homicide or torture should be ready to serve the same amount of time in jail as adult offenders. This is
because
teenagers
should be aware that justice will
be served
and in case of a major
crime
, they will not have any advantages due to their
age
.
Thus
, it will act as a deterrent for the youth and discourage them from commitment of a felony.
As well
as this, it will be right to sentence an adolescent for a shorter jail term
because
released
criminals
tend to commit a new offense
just
after
dismission
.
However
, those cases, which
are involved
mature
criminals
who may force a child to break a law, should
be assisted
with a great deliberation due to the reason that a
teenager
may be a victim in spite the fact of committing an
offence
.
For instance
, an adult offender may threaten to a younger person by
different
violent acts in case if they will not obey and refuse to perpetrate an
offence
.
Consequently
, in this kind of cases jury or a judge should take into account the
age
of a convicted person.
In conclusion
, I believe that major
crimes
should
be sentenced
equally
despite the
age
of a
criminal
. Meanwhile, juridical system should consider if a person under the
age
majority
was involved
into a
crime
by force or not.
9Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
14Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
4Mistakes