Due to the escalating pollution and huge population, healthy food is a great concern for many. While healthcare budget for the government is increasing each year, the public health condition, on the contrary, is deteriorating. Some opine that the government needs to pass laws regarding food intake to improve the public health, while others oppose this idea as they believe that it is a matter of individual choice. The following paragraphs will shed some light on this debate before drawing a logical conclusion.
To begin with, healthy lifestyle is a choice and habit of an individual. No matter how many laws are passed and how strictly the government monitors the food quality, if a person does not follow the healthy lifestyle and eating habit, he will surely suffer from health related issues. Thus the choices of individuals greatly affect the overall health condition of a nation. To lead a healthy life citizens do not need expensive food, gym facilities, expert dieticians and so on. For instance, the rich population of a country suffers from obesity, diabetics and many other diseases that are less frequent among the middle-class people. This proves that purchasing ability and budget are not the most important aspect of a healthy life.
On the other side, use of chemicals, preservatives and adhesives in food items should be totally banned and only the government can ensure that. Even after having proper diet and exercise, if people are forced to eat foods that have unexpected chemicals, they would suffer from dangerous diseases. Using unauthorised chemicals, selling expired and low-quality food should be forbidden. Infrequent market monitoring and the lack of quality control for food items are two reasons our market is full of unhygienic food items. The government's initiative can greatly reduce this unexpected corruption and crime in the food industry and market.
To conclude, the citizens of a country have to practise a healthy lifestyle while the government should ensure the hygiene in food production and food sells. Both of their combined initiatives and efforts can greatly promote the public health.
Due to the escalating pollution and huge population,
healthy
food
is a great concern for
many
. While healthcare budget for the
government
is increasing each year, the public
health
condition,
on the contrary
, is deteriorating.
Some
opine that the
government
needs to pass laws regarding
food
intake to
improve
the public
health
, while others oppose this
idea
as they believe that it is a matter of individual choice. The following paragraphs will shed
some
light on this debate
before
drawing a logical conclusion.
To
begin
with,
healthy
lifestyle is a choice and habit of an individual. No matter how
many
laws
are passed
and how
strictly
the
government
monitors the
food
quality, if a person does not follow the
healthy
lifestyle and eating habit, he will
surely
suffer from
health
related issues.
Thus
the choices of individuals
greatly
affect the
overall
health
condition of a nation. To lead a
healthy
life citizens do not need expensive
food
, gym facilities, expert
dieticians
and
so
on.
For instance
, the rich population of a country suffers from obesity, diabetics and
many
other diseases that are less frequent among the middle-
class
people
. This proves that purchasing ability and budget are not the most
important
aspect of a
healthy
life.
On the other side,
use
of chemicals, preservatives and adhesives in
food
items should be
totally
banned and
only
the
government
can ensure that. Even after having proper diet and exercise, if
people
are forced
to eat
foods
that have unexpected chemicals, they would suffer from
dangerous
diseases. Using
unauthorised
chemicals, selling expired and low-quality
food
should
be forbidden
. Infrequent market monitoring and the lack of quality control for
food
items are two reasons our market is full of unhygienic
food
items. The
government
's initiative can
greatly
reduce
this unexpected corruption and crime in the
food
industry and market.
To conclude
, the citizens of a country
have to
practise
a
healthy
lifestyle while the
government
should ensure the hygiene in
food
production and
food
sells. Both of their combined initiatives and efforts can
greatly
promote the public
health
.