Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think that public health of a country can be improved if the government make laws regarding nutritious food but other think that it is the matter of personal choice and personal responsibility. Discuss both views and give your opinion. v.2

Some people think that public health of a country can be improved if the government make laws regarding nutritious food but other think that it is the matter of personal choice and personal responsibility. v. 2
Although, healthy lifestyle depends upon a balanced diet, but in the present days majority of people rely on unhealthy foods. Therefore lots of persons reckon that the government should impose strict laws for providing better feed products, however the rest of masses consider that it depends on the people to eat according to their choice. In following piece of writing, I will throw light on both views along with my opinion. First of all, there are myriads of reasons for higher authority's responsibility towards making strong rules regarding nutritious diet, but the most prominent one is that, most of the restaurants, street vendors and hotels used low quality products to make cuisines, which is dangerous for the health of people. Hence, these types of products leads to human in deadly ailments such as cancer, heart problems. Therefore regime should make strict rules against it. For instance, a survey by WHO which reveals that 35% persons suffered from cancer due to overuse of junk food. Moreover, the government also impose higher taxes on products that are unhealthy for the body, by this way, people give less attention to these products, because of heavy cost. On the contrast, most of the people also opine that it is the individual's responsibility and own preference to choose the meal. Firstly, in hectic life schedule, every person has no enough time to make their own fare at home, hence they preferred to eat outside, although they know that these types of cuisines are unhealthy for them. Furthermore, the new generation also gets addicted to the junk food and they don't prefer to eat homemade dishes. For example, in last couple of years, there are lots of restaurants open in each and every city, due to the burgeoning in the demand for such products. In a nutshell, according to the arguments aforementioned above, one reach to a conclusion that the government should make strict and steady laws for providing a balanced diet to each and every citizen.
Although, healthy lifestyle depends upon a balanced diet,
but
in the present
days
majority of
people
rely on unhealthy foods.
Therefore
lots of persons reckon that the
government
should impose strict laws for providing better feed
products
,
however
the rest of masses consider that it depends on the
people
to eat according to their choice. In following piece of writing, I will throw light on both views along with my opinion.

First of all
, there are myriads of reasons for higher authority's responsibility towards making strong
rules
regarding nutritious diet,
but
the most prominent one is that, most of the restaurants, street vendors and hotels
used
low quality
products
to
make
cuisines, which is
dangerous
for the health of
people
.
Hence
, these types of
products
leads to human in deadly ailments such as cancer, heart problems.
Therefore
regime should
make
strict
rules
against it.
For instance
, a survey by WHO which reveals that 35% persons suffered from cancer due to overuse of junk food.
Moreover
, the
government
also
impose higher taxes on
products
that are unhealthy for the body, by this way,
people
give less attention to these
products
,
because
of heavy cost.

On the contrast, most of the
people
also
opine that it is the individual's responsibility and
own
preference to choose the meal.
Firstly
, in hectic life schedule, every person has no
enough
time to
make
their
own
fare at home,
hence
they preferred to eat outside, although they know that these types of cuisines are unhealthy for them.
Furthermore
, the new generation
also
gets
addicted to the junk
food and
they don't prefer to eat homemade dishes.
For example
, in last couple of years, there are lots of restaurants open in each and every city, due to the burgeoning in the demand for such products.

In a nutshell, according to the arguments aforementioned above, one reach to a conclusion that the
government
should
make
strict and steady laws for providing a balanced diet to each and every citizen.
16Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
14Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
5Mistakes
One language sets you in a corridor for life. Two languages open every door along the way.
Frank Smith

IELTS essay Some people think that public health of a country can be improved if the government make laws regarding nutritious food but other think that it is the matter of personal choice and personal responsibility. v. 2

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
331 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 5.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts