Presently, there are certain people, who opine that governments are responsible for
dealing with the impact humans make on the environment. Others strongly believe that individuals are accountable for it. In this essay, I will debate the two viewpoints andsuggest my opinion.
According to many, state governmental organs must be obligated to control and
fight the consequences of human activities on Earth. Evidently, these directly affect the
environment and sometimes present serious problems for whole regions or ecosystems.
One of the strongest arguments that underpins the idea of governmental responsibility
is that the authorities have access to abundant resources on a large scale – people,
finances, infrastructure, and of course – legislative capacity. For instance, such degree
of power allows Germany to make a noticeable ecological impact in any industry.
On the other hand, more and more people are of the opinion that we as individuals
should be environmentally conscious, making sure our actions do not destroy the
atmosphere around us. Indeed, this is quite a strong position, because every person is a building block of society, and the shift in personal behaviour of everyone will inevitably result in substantial changes of social norms. One prominent example is the movement “Eco Scouts” that unites those who are not indifferent to the state of our planet. Hence,
the members strive to follow the “zero waste” concept, raising awareness about recycling and eco-friendly agriculture.
In conclusion, one can argue that the most obvious decision would be to transfer
the environmental responsibility to governments, given their access to resources.
Nevertheless, I firmly believe that any valid change starts from individual awareness and action. Therefore, I consciously try to decrease my ecological footprint and invite my friends to follow suit.
Presently
, there are certain
people
, who opine that
governments
are responsible for
dealing with the impact humans
make
on the environment. Others
strongly
believe that individuals are accountable for it. In this essay, I will debate the two viewpoints
andsuggest
my opinion.
According to
many
, state governmental organs
must
be obligated
to control and
fight the consequences of human activities on Earth.
Evidently
, these
directly
affect the
environment and
sometimes
present serious problems for whole regions or ecosystems.
One of the strongest arguments that underpins the
idea
of governmental responsibility
is that the authorities have access to abundant resources on a large scale
–
people
,
finances, infrastructure, and
of course
–
legislative capacity.
For instance
, such degree
of power
allows
Germany to
make
a noticeable ecological impact in any industry.
On the other hand
, more and more
people
are of the opinion that we as individuals
should be
environmentally
conscious, making sure our actions do not
destroy
the
atmosphere around us
.
Indeed
, this is quite a strong position,
because
every person is a building block of society, and the shift in personal
behaviour
of everyone will
inevitably
result in substantial
changes
of social norms. One prominent example is the movement “Eco Scouts” that unites those who are not indifferent to the state of our planet.
Hence
,
the members strive to follow the “zero waste” concept, raising awareness about recycling and eco-friendly agriculture.
In conclusion
, one can argue that the most obvious decision would be to transfer
the environmental responsibility to
governments
,
given
their access to resources.
Nevertheless
, I
firmly
believe that any valid
change
starts
from individual awareness and action.
Therefore
, I
consciously
try to decrease my ecological footprint and invite my friends to follow suit.