Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think that it is the responsibility of governments to take care of the environment, while others believe that it is the responsibility of people to take care of environment. Discuss both views and give your opinion. v.3

Some people think that it is the responsibility of governments to take care of the environment, while others believe that it is the responsibility of people to take care of environment. v. 3
While some people believe that the state is in charge of taking care of the in natural environment, others argue that people are accountable for looking after of surrounding habitat. There are rational argument on both sides of this contentious topic which will be discussed in detail, followed by my own take on the matter. On the one hand, people who think that the mammon is responsible for taking care or preservation of the environment. To begin with, they believe since the government has great authority, then in many cases it can responsible for taking measures in conservation and taking care of the environment. That is to say, the mammon has many facilities which are maybe very helpful in protection and looking after of surrounding habitat. For instance, in many cases the government can legislate some laws which tend to conserve and taking care of natural the environment. Moreover, the state can contribute to environmental habitat conservation from a natural disaster in many instances. On the other hand, others argue people are accountable for environmental protection and taking care. The main reason justifying their belief is that, people are who have the most interaction with the natural environment. More specifically, since people have the most fundamental interaction therefor, they have the most influence on natural surrounding habitat. A good example of this is, we are eating and drinking from environment while we go vacation again in beach or jungles which are a natural habitat or environment. Furthermore, in many cases, people are who can take important action to protect and conserve the natural environment due to the fact that they have the most interactions with the natural environment. In conclusion, there are valid argument on both sides of the controversy; on balance however it is my firm conviction that however, the state can take important measures in environmental habitat protection and taking care, people playing an important role in environmental conservation and looking after because former causes.
While
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
believe that the state is in charge of taking
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
care
of the in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
natural
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
, others argue that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
are accountable for looking after of surrounding
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
habitat
. There are rational argument on both sides of this contentious topic which will
be discussed
in detail, followed by my
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
take on the matter.

On the one hand,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
who
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that the mammon is responsible for taking
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
care
or preservation of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
. To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begin
with, they believe since the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
has great authority, then in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
cases it
The word 'responsible' is a noun or an adjective. A verb or adverb is missing or misspelled here, or maybe a comma is missing.
can responsible
for taking measures in conservation and taking
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
care
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
.
That is
to say, the mammon has
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
facilities which are maybe
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
helpful in protection and looking after of surrounding
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
habitat
.
For instance
, in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
cases the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
can legislate
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
laws which tend to conserve and taking
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
care
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
natural
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
.
Moreover
, the state can contribute to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environmental
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
habitat
conservation from a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
natural
disaster in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
instances.

On the other hand
, others argue
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
are accountable for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environmental
protection and taking
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
care
. The main reason justifying their belief is that,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
are who have the most interaction with the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
natural
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
. More
specifically
, since
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
have the most fundamental interaction therefor, they have the most influence on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
natural
surrounding
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
habitat
. A
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
example of this is, we are eating and drinking from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
while we go vacation again in beach or jungles which are a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
natural
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
habitat
or
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
.
Furthermore
, in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
cases,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
are who can take
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
action to protect and conserve the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
natural
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environment
due to the fact that they have the most interactions with the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
natural
environment.

In conclusion
, there are valid argument on both sides of the controversy; on balance
however
it is my firm conviction that
however
, the state can take
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
measures in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environmental
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
habitat
protection and taking
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
care
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
playing an
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
role in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
environmental
conservation and looking after
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
former causes.
10Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
40Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes

IELTS essay Some people think that it is the responsibility of governments to take care of the environment, while others believe that it is the responsibility of people to take care of environment. v. 3

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
327 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts