Some people think that it is a good thing for senior management positions to have very high salaries compared to other workers of lower positions in the same company. To what extent do you agree. v.2
Some people think that it is a good thing for senior management positions to have very high salaries compared to other workers of lower positions in the same company. v. 2
Although it is sometimes thought that environmental issues should be handled globally, other people believe that it ought to be dealt nation wise. In my opinion, tackling environmental issues either globally or nationally is depends upon severity of a problem.
On the one hand, discussing environmental problems on a global scale helps to get more ideas and solutions to overcome problems, according to some. For example, United Nation keeps discussing with many countries on devastating environmental issues such as Global warming, preventing Ozone layer, which helps them to get more accurate solutions to overcome such problems. Such kind of discussions, furthermore, helps to spread message across the world to tackle and overcome destructing environmental problems as media over the world keep close eyes on these discussions. Discussing such kind of issues on a global level helps to share science and technologies to handle environmental problems. For instance, many developed countries have excellent tools to get advance information regarding Tsunami which can be shared among the non developed countries to help them to handle such major problems.
On the other hand, it is often thought that environmental problems ought to deal nationally as it helps to get a quick and accurate solution. Issues such as Air pollution, water pollution should discuss nation wise because each nation can analyse these issues better and troubleshoot them accurately. Discussing and handling these issues nationally helps them to be self reliant and motivates them for new inventions.
Finally, in my view, both methods are important to handle environmental issues, but tackling these issues nationally or on a global scale is true depends on destructive level of the issue. Discussing highly destructive issues on a global level helps to get different ideas and accurate answer to overcome these issues, whereas handling less harmful environmental problems nationally helps to get fast solution and nations apply themselves to new inventions.
In conclusion, despite people having different views, I believe it would be better to handle more dangerous issues on a global scale and small issues nationally.
Although it is
sometimes
thought
that
environmental
issues
should
be handled
globally, other
people
believe that it ought to
be dealt
nation
wise. In my opinion, tackling
environmental
issues
either globally or
nationally
is depends upon severity of a problem.
On the one hand,
discussing
environmental
problems
on a
global
scale
helps
to
get
more
ideas
and
solutions
to overcome
problems
, according to
some
.
For example
, United
Nation
keeps
discussing
with
many
countries on devastating
environmental
issues
such as
Global
warming, preventing Ozone layer, which
helps
them to
get
more accurate
solutions
to overcome such
problems
. Such kind of discussions,
furthermore
,
helps
to spread message across the world to tackle and overcome destructing
environmental
problems
as media over the world
keep
close eyes on these discussions.
Discussing
such kind of
issues
on a
global
level
helps
to share science and technologies to
handle
environmental
problems
.
For instance
,
many
developed countries
have excellent tools to
get
advance information regarding Tsunami which can
be shared
among the non
developed countries
to
help
them to
handle
such major problems.
On the other hand
, it is
often
thought
that
environmental
problems
ought to deal
nationally
as it
helps
to
get
a quick and accurate
solution
.
Issues
such as Air pollution, water pollution should discuss
nation
wise
because
each
nation
can
analyse
these
issues
better and troubleshoot them
accurately
.
Discussing
and handling these
issues
nationally
helps
them to be
self reliant
and motivates them for new inventions.
Finally
, in my view, both methods are
important
to
handle
environmental
issues
,
but
tackling these
issues
nationally
or on a
global
scale is true depends on destructive level of the
issue
.
Discussing
highly
destructive
issues
on a
global
level
helps
to
get
different
ideas
and accurate answer to overcome these
issues
, whereas handling less harmful
environmental
problems
nationally
helps
to
get
fast
solution
and
nations
apply themselves to new inventions.
In conclusion
, despite
people
having
different
views, I believe it would be better to
handle
more
dangerous
issues
on a
global
scale and
small
issues
nationally
.
7.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7.5Mistakes