Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people think that governments should spend money on railways. Others believe that there should be more investment into new roads. Discuss both sides and give your opinion v.4

Some people think that governments should spend money on railways. Others believe that there should be more investment into new roads. 4
About governments investment in public transport, two opposing views have been suggested, one of which is related to the construction of more railways, while the other is about structures of new roads. From my perspective, governments should pay more attention to railways, since it is more beneficial for communities. According to the perspective of some, the benefits of railways are more than the advantages of road vehicles. The rationale behind their thought might be the safety and convenience that have been provided by trains, particularly high-speed trains. I also support this point of view and believe that people can access a variety of amenities on a train such as toilets, a small cafe and wider seats with more leg space. It also should be considered that high-speed trains are available to carry hundreds of people at once, and they are faster than any road vehicles. For some other people, however, privacy might have importance, and they do not wish to travel with others. Besides, parents who have children at school age usually prefer driving them to school while they commute to work by a personal vehicle. Yet, I am not on the same page as these people. To my way of thinking, driving cars pollute the air with car fumes and waste non-renewable natural resources. From where I stand, people might be more sensitive to using any personal vehicle, whether they do not have to. So current roads can be enough for the community. In conclusion, what can be concluded from the aforementioned remarks is that although some individuals advocate spending more money into new roads, I firmly believe that railways have more benefits for not only communities but also nature. Because of these reasons, governments might spare more resources for railways.
About
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
investment in public transport, two opposing views have
been suggested
, one of which
is related
to the construction of more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railways
, while the other is about structures of new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
. From my perspective,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
should pay more attention to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railways
, since it is more beneficial for communities.

According to the perspective of
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
, the benefits of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railways
are more than the advantages of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
road
vehicles. The rationale behind their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
thought
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
might
be the safety and convenience that have
been provided
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trains
,
particularly
high-speed
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trains
. I
also
support this point of view and believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
can access a variety of amenities on a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
train
such as toilets, a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
small
'cafe' is an imported foreign expression, which originally has a diacritic. Consider using "café"
cafe
and wider seats with more leg space. It
also
should
be considered
that high-speed
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trains
are available to carry hundreds of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
at once, and they are faster than any
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
road
vehicles.

For
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
,
however
, privacy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
might
have importance, and they do not wish to travel with others.
Besides
, parents who have children at school age
usually
prefer driving them to school while they commute to work by a personal vehicle.
Yet
, I am not on the same page as these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
. To my way of thinking, driving cars pollute the air with car fumes and waste non-renewable natural resources. From where I stand,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
might
be more sensitive to using any personal vehicle, whether they do not
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
have to
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
current
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
can be
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
for the community.

In conclusion
, what can
be concluded
from the aforementioned remarks is that although
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
individuals advocate spending more money into new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
, I
firmly
believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railways
have more benefits for not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
communities
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
nature.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Because
of these reasons,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
might
spare more resources for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railways
.
8Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8Mistakes
You live a new life for every new language you speak. If you know only one language, you live only once.
Czech Proverb

IELTS essay Some people think that governments should spend money on railways. Others believe that there should be more investment into new roads. 4

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
292 words
8
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 8.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 8.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 8.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 8.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts