It is argued that government should take steps to change citizens’ lifestyle. While, some people intend that everybody should have responsibilities for their choice in the life, I believe in the positive regulation the local authorities ushers in.
On the one hand, living your own life has a variety of positive in individual’s life sector. A first noticeable point is that once people can do what they like, they will work more effectively. To explain, when individuals find their passion in workplace, they will devote full of energies to the companies, thereby boosting economic development. Furthermore, being able to choose a lifestyle that is suitable to yourself will reduce stress and enhance people’ healthy. For example, some individuals play sport to improve their body strength, while others maintain weigh by engaging in a healthy diet. Even those these kinds of activities may have negative effects such as being injured or becoming too skinny.
On the other hand, merits of choose their own way to live cannot overshadow the vital role of the intervention of the state. The primary reason is that by enacting laws regard to control societies, the government can lead country through economic crisis. For instance, after becoming independent country, Singapore authority offered many regulations to develop such as one family just had one offspring or asked people to live together in houses built by the government, as a result, Singapore has become a world financial centre. In addition, with their responsibility, the state should encourage citizens to raise their awareness of society. To illustrate, government should make residents to be involved in social activities to connect people together or local authorities can mitigate people who smoking in a public area by punishing them strictly. Therefore, it can prevent people from serious diseases in the future.
In conclusion, while there are strong arguments that personal decision has more benefit, I believe that government always gives appropriate choices for their residents.
It
is argued
that
government
should take steps to
change
citizens’ lifestyle. While,
some
people
intend that everybody should have responsibilities for their choice in the life, I believe in the
positive
regulation the local authorities ushers in.
On the one hand, living your
own
life has a variety of
positive
in individual’s life sector. A
first
noticeable point is that once
people
can do what they like, they will work more
effectively
. To
explain
, when individuals find their passion in workplace, they will devote full of energies to the
companies
, thereby boosting economic development.
Furthermore
, being able to choose a lifestyle
that is
suitable to yourself will
reduce
stress
and enhance
people’
healthy.
For example
,
some
individuals play sport to
improve
their body strength, while others maintain weigh by engaging in a healthy diet. Even those these kinds of activities may have
negative
effects such as
being injured
or becoming too skinny.
On the other hand
, merits of choose their
own
way to
live
cannot overshadow the vital role of the intervention of the state. The primary reason is that by enacting laws regard to control societies, the
government
can lead country through economic crisis.
For instance
, after becoming independent country, Singapore authority offered
many
regulations to develop such as one family
just
had one offspring or asked
people
to
live
together in
houses
built by the
government
,
as a result
, Singapore has become a world financial
centre
.
In addition
, with their responsibility, the state should encourage citizens to raise their awareness of society. To illustrate,
government
should
make
residents to
be involved
in social activities to connect
people
together or local authorities can mitigate
people
who smoking in a public area by punishing them
strictly
.
Therefore
, it can
prevent
people
from serious diseases in the future.
In conclusion
, while there are strong arguments that personal decision has more benefit, I believe that
government
always gives appropriate choices for their residents.