Free education on all levels is the controversial debate since beginning, some opine that government should provide free education on all levels while other opine that it' s a responsibility of individuals to pay for their own tertiary education. In this essay I will discuss both views. However, I am with former view and I will put forward number of arguments to support my view.
First, young people from poor families could be very smart. Looking back to history and biographies of distinguished people, raised in poverty can illustrate this best. Making schooling available only for fortunate is not fair. Moreover, the state well-being could also be affected, because there would be a lack of talented specialists, whose skills was not discovered and developed by proper training.
Another advantage of making education free of charge is the happiness of the nation. An individual' s inability to collect the amount of money he needs to pay school or university fee cause stress and anxiety in the middle-class society, which can even keep them from having children. Nowadays we can see that the lowest birthrate is in countries where prices of enrollment to highest education institutions are very high. This clearly indicates the fact that citizens of rich countries do not feel able to provide their future offspring proper education.
Finally, nothing seems to be more beneficial to a country' s economy than an educated and intelligent nation. Free courses and study programs can prepare excellent specialists, who would work to bring profit themselves and hence their country. That would surely compensate most expenses of state budget caused by education of no charge.
On the other hand, free education on all levels will put more burden on government' s shoulder and this way government cannot spend more on other important thing like health and defence which are equally important for development of any country. Also, instead of providing free education to all on all levels government can provide education loan for tertiary education for students who can' t afford the fees and provide scholarship for tertiary education based on students intelligence level.
To sum up, even though making all schools free can be very expensive for a state' s economy, advantages are invaluable. After several years such improvements would bring fruits of happy, intelligent nation confident about its future.
Free
education
on all
levels
is the controversial debate since beginning,
some
opine that
government
should
provide
free
education
on all
levels
while other opine that
it&
#039; s a responsibility of individuals to pay for their
own
tertiary
education
. In this essay I will discuss both views.
However
, I am with former view and I will put forward number of arguments to support my view.
First
, young
people
from poor families could be
very
smart. Looking back to history and biographies of distinguished
people
, raised in poverty can illustrate this best. Making schooling available
only
for fortunate is not
fair
.
Moreover
, the state well-being could
also
be
affected
,
because
there would be a lack of talented specialists, whose
skills
was not discovered and developed by proper training.
Another advantage of making
education
free
of charge is the happiness of the nation. An
individual&
#039; s inability to collect the amount of money he needs to pay school or university fee cause
stress
and anxiety in the middle-
class
society, which can even
keep
them from having children. Nowadays we can
see
that the lowest birthrate is in
countries
where prices of enrollment to
highest
education
institutions are
very
high. This
clearly
indicates the fact that citizens of rich
countries
do not feel able to
provide
their future offspring proper education.
Finally
, nothing seems to be more beneficial to a
country&
#039; s economy than an educated and intelligent nation.
Free
courses and study programs can prepare excellent specialists, who would work to bring profit themselves and
hence
their
country
. That would
surely
compensate most expenses of state budget caused by
education
of no charge.
On the other hand
,
free
education
on all
levels
will put more burden on
government&
#039; s shoulder and this way
government
cannot spend more on other
important
thing like health and
defence
which are
equally
important
for development of any
country
.
Also
,
instead
of providing
free
education
to all on all
levels
government
can
provide
education
loan for tertiary
education
for students who
can&
#039; t afford the fees and
provide
scholarship for tertiary
education
based on
students
intelligence level.
To sum up,
even though
making all schools
free
can be
very
expensive for a
state&
#039; s economy, advantages are invaluable. After several years such improvements would bring fruits of happy, intelligent nation confident about its future.