These days, education plays indispensable role in our society in order to gain successful life. It is thought by some people that the government should provide all level of education to their citizen free of cost. While others believe that individual should pay their own tuition fee. I completely agree with former thought that people should get equal opportunity to gain education.
On one hand side, every one has rights to live comfortably and lavish lifestyle, but nowadays it is impossible without education. Some people argued in favour of that government should invest higher amount of money to educate the people that leads a nation to economically stronger. For instance, a country like a Japan, government took responsibility to educate their people free of cost at all level. Thus the Japan is considered a developed country due to the advance technology and educated people.
Furthermore, poor people have talent but not have facilities to study, they could waste their talents, if they get chance to obtain higher education they will excel and because of this crime rate in country will reduce due to gaining employment after higher studies. Thus free education gives tremendous benefits not only to a person but also to the whole society.
On the other hand, some people argued that individual should pay for their tertiary education. According to them government have other responsibilities to fulfill the citizens requirements. For instance, if they invest all funding to education, country would have poor health system and bad transport system. Besides, in order to become a developed country, higher authorities need huge amount of funding to build a military for protection from enemies, and scientists needs billion of dollars to do research to protect people from devastating diseases.
In conclusion, in my opinion, if the government stopped funding the education, many student will not be able to afford tertiary education which lead to unemployment and increase crime rate. Therefore, I strongly believed that government should fund tertiary studies.
These days,
education
plays indispensable role in our society in order to gain successful life. It is
thought
by
some
people
that the
government
should provide all level of
education
to their citizen free of cost.
While
others believe that individual should pay their
own
tuition fee. I completely
agree
with former
thought
that
people
should
get
equal opportunity to gain education.
On one hand side, every one has rights to
live
comfortably
and lavish lifestyle,
but
nowadays it is impossible without
education
.
Some
people
argued in
favour
of that
government
should invest higher amount of money to educate the
people
that leads a nation to
economically
stronger.
For instance
, a
country
like a Japan,
government
took responsibility to educate their
people
free of cost at all level.
Thus
the Japan
is considered
a developed
country
due to the advance technology and educated
people
.
Furthermore
, poor
people
have talent
but
not have facilities to study, they could waste their talents, if they
get
chance to obtain higher
education
they will excel and
because of this
crime rate in
country
will
reduce
due to gaining employment after higher studies.
Thus
free
education
gives tremendous benefits not
only
to a person
but
also
to the whole society.
On the other hand
,
some
people
argued that individual should pay for their tertiary
education
. According to them
government
have other responsibilities to fulfill the citizens requirements.
For instance
, if they invest all funding to
education
,
country
would have poor health system and
bad
transport system.
Besides
, in order to become a developed
country
, higher authorities need huge amount of funding to build a military for protection from enemies, and scientists needs
billion
of dollars to do research to protect
people
from devastating diseases.
In conclusion
, in my opinion, if the
government
stopped
funding the
education
,
many student
will not be able to afford tertiary
education
which lead to unemployment and increase crime rate.
Therefore
, I
strongly
believed that
government
should fund tertiary studies.