Since the inception of globalisation era, tourism industry has been proliferation world widely. Many individuals argue that international visitors must pay extra money as compare to homeland citizen while visiting attrective spots in the country. However, I completely disagree with this argument. Moreover, this essay will elaborate how this practice can hamper the various sectors of the domestic economy in subsequent paragraphs.
Excessive money collections from outsider visitors can put a various negative effects on local establishments. Firstly, it will reduce the number of visitors for the particular destination. As a result, total amount generation will also reduce. Furthermore this trend can also divert incomers to other cheap destinations of the world. Secondly, owing to low numbers, other businesses who are associated with tourism can also face a reduction in their turnover. For instance, hotel industry and local markets near to sightseer attractions may find difficult to sustain when volume of visitors will reduce.
Additional monetary charges will also affect the image of the nation as well as local of the local community. Once the outsiders will build their negative perception toward particular community or place, thenthen it became very difficult to change that even in a long period of time. For example, less number of people from the rest of the world visit India as compare to Dubai and South Africa just because of price discrimination while visiting the unique locations such as The Taj Mahal. Apart from this, price differentiation for any sight entry is a social and unethical activity, because any unique place cannot be treated as an asset of fewer people only. Just like Mount Everest is not a self constructed wonder of any single human being or community.
To conclude, although one country can enjoy a limited financial freedom by charging high ticket from international tourists, still if we deeply analyse this process for the long run then it is clear that total revenue and popularity can be reduced irrespective of the importance of any reputed place.
Since the inception of
globalisation
era, tourism industry has been proliferation world
widely
.
Many
individuals argue that international
visitors
must
pay extra money as compare to homeland citizen while visiting
attrective
spots in the country.
However
, I completely disagree with this argument.
Moreover
, this essay will elaborate how this practice can hamper the various sectors of the domestic economy in subsequent paragraphs.
Excessive money collections from outsider
visitors
can put a various
negative
effects on
local
establishments.
Firstly
, it will
reduce
the number of
visitors
for the particular destination.
As a result
, total amount generation will
also
reduce
.
Furthermore
this trend can
also
divert incomers to other
cheap
destinations of the world.
Secondly
, owing to low numbers, other businesses who
are associated
with tourism can
also
face a reduction in their turnover.
For instance
, hotel industry and
local
markets near to sightseer attractions may find difficult to sustain when volume of
visitors
will
reduce
.
Additional monetary charges will
also
affect the image of the nation
as well
as
local
of the
local
community. Once the outsiders will build their
negative
perception toward particular community or place,
thenthen
it became
very
difficult to
change
that even in a long period of time.
For example
, less number of
people
from the rest of the world visit India as compare to Dubai and South Africa
just
because
of price discrimination while visiting the unique locations such as The Taj Mahal. Apart from this, price differentiation for any sight entry is a social and unethical activity,
because
any unique place cannot
be treated
as an asset of fewer
people
only
.
Just
like Mount Everest is not a self constructed wonder of any single human being or community.
To conclude
, although one country can enjoy
a limited financial freedom
by charging high ticket from international tourists,
still
if we
deeply
analyse
this process for the long run then it is
clear
that total revenue and popularity can be
reduced
irrespective of the importance of any reputed place.