Today, there are differing opinions on how environmental problems should be resolved, while some think it should be addressed nationally, others believe it should be handled on a global scale. In my opinion, the determinant for how environmental problems should be handled is severity and scope of impact.
Firstly, some people believe that it is best for environmental problems to be handled on a global scale because there are many environmental problems that affect the world globally such as global warming and deforestation. Problems such as global warming should be handled on a global scale because many countries are not well equipped and do not have the budgets to tackle such issues effectively. In recent times, we have observed that the United Nations Organization actively disseminates information worldwide to sensitize countries on the effects of global warming and how best to reduce its effects. Such environmental issues affecting the world holistically are best handled globally with aid from international bodies.
On the other hand, people opine that that environment issues should be tackled nationally as countries are aware of the direct impact these issues and will target and resolve them more efficiently. In cases of domestic environmental problems such as water pollution, it is best that they are handled nationally as the government can identify the causes of the problem and provided a targeted solution timeously.
In my opinion, environmental problems should be dealt with according to the severity of the issues, local environmental problems like water pollution and domestic flooding should be resolved nationally while problems such as global warming should be handled on a global scale.
In conclusion, both opinions on how environmental problems should be resolved are valid, however, it is best to handle the problems according to its severity and scope of impact.
Today
, there are differing
opinions
on how
environmental
problems
should
be resolved
, while
some
think
it should
be addressed
nationally
, others believe it should be
handled
on a
global
scale. In my
opinion
, the determinant for how
environmental
problems
should be
handled
is severity and scope of impact.
Firstly
,
some
people
believe that it is
best
for
environmental
problems
to be
handled
on a
global
scale
because
there are
many
environmental
problems
that affect the world globally such as
global
warming
and deforestation.
Problems
such as
global
warming
should be
handled
on a
global
scale
because
many
countries are not
well equipped
and do not have the budgets to tackle such
issues
effectively
. In recent times, we have observed that the United Nations Organization
actively
disseminates information worldwide to sensitize countries on the effects of
global
warming
and how
best
to
reduce
its effects. Such
environmental
issues
affecting the world
holistically
are
best
handled
globally with aid from international bodies.
On the other hand
,
people
opine that that environment
issues
should
be tackled
nationally
as countries are aware of the direct impact these
issues
and will target and resolve them more
efficiently
. In cases of domestic
environmental
problems
such as water pollution, it is
best
that they are
handled
nationally
as the
government
can identify the causes of the
problem
and provided a targeted solution
timeously
.
In my
opinion
,
environmental
problems
should
be dealt
with according to the severity of the
issues
, local
environmental
problems
like water pollution and domestic flooding should
be resolved
nationally
while
problems
such as
global
warming
should be
handled
on a
global
scale.
In
conclusion, both
opinions
on how
environmental
problems
should
be resolved
are valid,
however
, it is
best
to handle the
problems
according to its severity and scope of impact.
4Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
54Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
2Mistakes