It is considered that environmental issues should be escalated on the global level, while there are others who think that it is better to tackle them on the national stage. To my mind, I believe that everything should be solved coincidently for both cases that have a huge impact on the world.
On the one hand, solving problems globally gives an excellent example for the rest of the countries how to overcome any issues. They developed countries can share their experience and knowledge, where each country can follow and announce in their own countries. As a result, introducing drastic measures facilitates increasing a level of public awareness and solving many environmental issues such as deforestation, air and water pollution and like that. The UK is a prime example, where their Government inherited gained experience by setting up sewage disposal plants from Germany in 2019.
On the other hand, each country has difficult issues depending on their number of denizens, recycling plants, harmful factories and number of vehicles. It means that only governments of these countries should make up the plan on how to cope with these hurdles to enhance their level of ecology in these urban cities. For instance, Sweden has introduced recently the specific green zones in the city centre, where all people can breathe much easier and can stay much healthier compared to the past.
Finally, in my opinion, eco issues should be solved on both stages via the beneficial background of the world, where each state can emphasize difficult areas and set up improvements to solve this problem. Moreover, this approach can cover more blank spaces and attain desirable effects.
In conclusion, solving eco issues is a process that includes gained overwhelming experience and background on global level and separate countries with their own environmental problems. Eventually, this method gives more benefits rather than consider and inherit only global advices.
It
is considered
that environmental
issues
should
be escalated
on the global
level
, while there are others who
think
that it is better to tackle them on the national stage. To my mind, I believe that everything should
be solved
coincidently
for both cases that have a huge impact on the world.
On the one hand, solving problems globally gives an excellent example for the rest of the
countries
how to overcome any
issues
. They developed
countries
can share their experience and knowledge, where each
country
can follow and announce in their
own
countries
.
As a result
, introducing drastic measures facilitates increasing a
level
of public awareness and solving
many
environmental
issues
such as deforestation, air and water pollution and like that. The UK is a prime example, where their
Government
inherited gained experience by setting up sewage disposal plants from Germany in 2019.
On the other hand
, each
country
has difficult
issues
depending on their number of denizens, recycling plants, harmful factories and number of vehicles. It means that
only
governments
of these
countries
should
make
up the plan on how to cope with these hurdles to enhance their
level
of ecology in these urban cities.
For instance
, Sweden has introduced recently the specific green zones in the city
centre
, where all
people
can breathe much easier and can stay much healthier compared to the past.
Finally
, in my opinion,
eco
issues
should
be solved
on both stages via the beneficial background of the world, where each state can emphasize difficult areas and set up improvements to solve this problem.
Moreover
, this approach can cover more blank spaces and attain desirable effects.
In conclusion
, solving
eco
issues
is a process that includes gained overwhelming experience and background on global
level
and separate
countries
with their
own
environmental problems.
Eventually
, this method gives more benefits
rather
than consider and inherit
only
global advices.