The issue with the environment is constantly at the top of the list of most discussed topics recently. The approach to rectify this problem has also turned into a polarising topic, some argue for the globalist approach, while others prefer it to be handled by individual countries. This essay will discuss the argument for both points of view, but agree that an international collusion will best handle the problem.
Several eminent environmentalist argue for all nations to solve the challenges of our environment under one umbrella. Proponents of this idea, always to the uneven distribution of wealth among nations. The fact of the matter is that, not all countries possess the financial muscle to withstand the negative economic impact of instituting environmental policies. For instance, Nigerian foreign exchange is dominated by crude oil export, it is there for apparent that putting restrictions on the use of fuel will be devastating to the economy and stock market. Therefore, it is proposed that economically buoyant nations should ne of assistance to third world countries.
However, other relevant professionals subscribe to a more nationalistic approach. Environmental issues are not generalized, in fact, it is different from one country to another. For example, some areas are afflicted with the problem of desert encroachment, while some suffer from rising ocean level that in turn leads to flooding.
Therefore, individual nations will diagnose and address problems with their environment efficiently. Despite this, nations still require an international organisation to monitor their commitment and curb any corruption.
In conclusion, this essay discussed the benefit of both approaches. In my opinion, there should be cooperation among nations, so that, wealthy nations will be of help to poorer countries.
The issue with the environment is
constantly
at the top of the list of most discussed topics recently. The
approach
to rectify this problem has
also
turned into a
polarising
topic,
some
argue for the globalist
approach
, while others prefer it to
be handled
by individual
countries
. This essay will discuss the argument for both points of view,
but
agree
that an international collusion will best handle the problem.
Several eminent environmentalist argue for all
nations
to solve the challenges of our environment under one umbrella. Proponents of this
idea
, always to the uneven distribution of wealth among
nations
. The fact of the matter is that, not all
countries
possess the financial muscle to withstand the
negative
economic impact of instituting environmental policies.
For instance
, Nigerian foreign exchange
is dominated
by crude oil export, it is there for apparent that putting restrictions on the
use
of fuel will be devastating to the economy and stock market.
Therefore
, it
is proposed
that
economically
buoyant
nations
should
ne
of assistance to third world countries.
However
, other relevant professionals subscribe to a more nationalistic
approach
. Environmental issues are not generalized, in fact, it is
different
from one
country
to another.
For example
,
some
areas
are afflicted
with the problem of desert encroachment, while
some
suffer from rising ocean level that in turn leads to flooding.
Therefore
, individual
nations
will diagnose and address problems with their environment
efficiently
. Despite this,
nations
still
require an international
organisation
to monitor their commitment and curb any corruption.
In conclusion
, this essay discussed the benefit of both
approaches
. In my opinion, there should be cooperation among
nations
,
so
that, wealthy
nations
will be of
help
to poorer
countries
.