It is debated whether the solution of climatic problems should be addressed at the national or international level. In my opinion the gravity of the issue deserves a multi-prong approach, involving domestic and cumulative resources. This essay will outline both the viewpoints and my opinion.
On the one hand, national efforts to resolve atmospheric problems are weighed more firstly because of ease in execution. This means that all plans in this regard require implementation at mass level. Hence, the states have more advantage in their capacities to enforce such policies. For example Pakistan has banned the use of plastic hand bags and to get it practised local government can do it through its law enforcement tools quite easily. Secondly, country based efforts gain more popularity, as people get familiarised with the local hazards more rapidly and there is no language barrier in comprehending these aspects. For instance, publicity for awareness against pollutants is published in local languages in various countries.
On the other hand, the role of the international community in the fight against climate deterioration is because of information sharing and devising an effective plan. Worldwide liaison against such common dangers has shown promising results. The UN and its institutions have shared various developments from across the globe. The knowledge based approach is successful because of innovations in identifying and curbing the hazards. Development and success in one state require to be communicated with others who are still ignorant in that field. Global forums like the UN are having effectiveness in treating issues like green house effects.
In conclusion, both nationwide and worldwide strategies have their role in solving issues of environment.
It
is debated
whether the solution of climatic problems should
be addressed
at the national or international level. In my opinion the gravity of the issue deserves a multi-prong approach, involving domestic and cumulative resources. This essay will outline both the viewpoints and my opinion.
On the one hand, national efforts to resolve atmospheric problems
are weighed
more
firstly
because
of
ease
in execution. This means that all plans in this regard require implementation at mass level.
Hence
, the states have more advantage in their capacities to enforce such policies.
For example
Pakistan has banned the
use
of plastic hand bags and to
get
it
practised
local
government
can do it through its law enforcement tools quite
easily
.
Secondly
, country based efforts gain more popularity, as
people
get
familiarised
with the local hazards more
rapidly
and there is no language barrier in comprehending these aspects.
For instance
, publicity for awareness against pollutants
is published
in local languages in various countries.
On the other hand
, the role of the international community in the fight against climate deterioration is
because
of information sharing and devising an effective plan. Worldwide liaison against such common
dangers
has shown promising results. The UN and its institutions have shared various developments from across the globe. The knowledge based approach is successful
because
of innovations in identifying and curbing the hazards. Development and success in one state require to
be communicated
with others who are
still
ignorant in that field. Global forums like the UN are having effectiveness in treating issues like green
house
effects.
In conclusion
, both nationwide and worldwide strategies have their role in solving issues of environment.