The aged people want to live in a residential home. In Britain, where nurses can take care of them, but the authority has to pay for this. Some people believe that the family should pay for the care of nursing homes. In my opinion, the government plays a vital rule in providing seniors with a suitable cure and a cost for elderly homes. Accordingly, the economic conditions and massive taxes.
First and foremost, the economic situation, nowadays, is restrained people for funding the medicines and senior homes because of economic recession. However, the authority is a burden of putting money as penalties after retirement. For example, Egypt in 1985 made a rule for antiquated people, that they are financed for their requirements and houses where nurses are responsible for helping. Although the jurisdiction made a law for preserving the older people's rights, the aged people didn't put their concentration on their health.
Second, massive taxes are constrained by the financial power of workers. As a result, the state has taken an amount of money as taxes to fund elderly homes such as people who are more than 65 years with all facilities. For instance, The USA in 1993 made jumped taxes on the employee that it was difficult to effort, but the workers after retirement they have been taking penalties for lifelong. Furthermore, they have lived comfortably in houses which are established for preserving the health of them and nurses who are responsible for giving them a cure and communicating to avoid aged people from isolation.
In conclusion, the circumstances these days make it harder for people to finance old people and epic taxes. Even though the development related to seniors happens this century, aged citizens still suffering. I agree with authority has a central role in providing old people their needs.
The
aged
people
want to
live
in a residential home. In Britain, where nurses can take care of them,
but
the authority
has to
pay for this.
Some
people
believe that the family should pay for the care of nursing
homes
. In my opinion, the
government
plays a vital
rule
in providing seniors with a suitable cure and a cost for elderly
homes
.
Accordingly
, the economic conditions and massive taxes.
First
and foremost, the economic situation, nowadays,
is restrained
people
for funding the medicines and senior
homes
because
of economic recession.
However
, the authority is a burden of putting money as penalties after retirement.
For example
, Egypt in 1985 made a
rule
for antiquated
people
, that they
are financed
for their requirements and
houses
where nurses are responsible for helping. Although the jurisdiction made a law for preserving the older
people
's rights, the
aged
people
didn't put their concentration on their health.
Second, massive
taxes
are constrained
by the financial power of workers.
As a result
, the state has taken an amount of money as
taxes
to fund elderly
homes
such as
people
who are more than 65 years with all facilities.
For instance
, The USA in 1993 made jumped
taxes
on the employee that it was difficult to effort,
but
the workers after retirement they have been taking penalties for lifelong.
Furthermore
, they have
lived
comfortably
in
houses
which
are established
for preserving the health of them and nurses who are responsible for giving them a cure and communicating to avoid
aged
people
from isolation.
In conclusion
, the circumstances these days
make
it harder for
people
to finance
old
people
and epic
taxes
.
Even though
the development related to seniors happens this century,
aged
citizens
still
suffering. I
agree
with authority has a central role in providing
old
people
their needs.