Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Some people think that developed countries have a higher responsibility to combat climate change than developing countries. Others believe that all countries should have the same responsibilities towards protecting the environment. v.6

There is no doubt that environmental issues are caused by all people around the world. Although some people say that it is the only duty of developed countries, I agree with others who are arguing that it is the role of every nation to save the globe. On one hand, it is clear that those people are blaming the well-established countries. The reason for this is that they are having a good economy, with this they can spend more of money on the precautions but, whereas poor countries may not contribute for this issue because of low economy. For example, having said that these nations with all the facilities given for their citizens, still can maintain other expenses but it's not the case for low economy countries. As a contradiction, improving basic needs is the prior thing that should focus on these provinces. On the other hand, in my opinion, all countries should take an active part in improving the environment. This is, because taking the stand is not an individual decision, which cannot be done by one country. For instance, each and every continental countries should contribute some responsibility from their end by reducing the pollution and keeping the surroundings clean and also reducing the waste from the industries. As a result, we can achieve this success all together. In conclusion, I have given my opinion clearly from above paragraphs to follow mentioned measures, if these people will make it as a habit then we can see the climate to it's normal position, otherwise it is hard to achieve it.

There is no doubt that environmental issues are caused
 by all You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 around the world. Although This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 say that it is the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 duty of developed You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
, I This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesce
agree
 with others who are arguing that it is the role of every nation to save the globe.

On one hand, it is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
 that those You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 are blaming the well-established You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
. The reason for this is
 that they are having a This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
 economy, with this they can spend more of money on the precautions This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
, whereas poor You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
 may not contribute for this issue This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of low economy. For example
, having said that these nations with all the facilities This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accorded
given
 for their citizens, still
 can maintain other expenses This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 it's not the case for low economy You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
. As a contradiction, improving basic needs is the prior thing that should focus on these provinces.

On the other hand
, in my opinion, all You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
 should take an active part in improving the environment. This is, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 taking the stand is not an individual decision, which cannot be done
 by one You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrusticbucolichomeyagrarianprovincial
country
. For instance
, each and every continental You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
 should contribute This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 responsibility from their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :expiration
end
 by reducing the pollution and keeping the surroundings clean and also
 reducing the waste from the industries. As a result
, we can achieve this success all together.

In conclusion
, I have This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accorded
given
 my opinion clearly
 from above paragraphs to follow mentioned measures, if these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 will This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 it as a habit then we can This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witness
see
 the climate to Did you mean “its” (possessive pronoun) instead of ‘it’s’ (short for ‘it is’)?its
it's
 normal position, otherwise
 it is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :arduous
hard
 to achieve it. 