With the advancement of technology, the world continues to prosper economic stability and urbanization more than ever, however, in contrast to such achievements, people faces increasing natural disasters such as storms, earthquakes and climate change. In order to respond effectively to the major threat, which is climate change, humanity is facing, there are some suggestions to make developed countries bare more obligation to solve this issue. Conversely, oppositions to this ideas have also been raised, claiming that all nations, with no regards to the development level, must equally part take in this together. This essay will address both sides of the argument.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that more advanced and powerful countries must lead the way to freeing the world from the irregular changes of the seasons as they possess more capability and produce more wastes which lead to bigger contribution as to why this natural phenomenon happens in the first place. In addition, modernized nations are financially capable to support new policies made to fix this issue as well as increasing the rate of recycling, which further help to cut down the speed of the changing climate. For instance, according to a recent research conducted at the university of Oxford, 67% of wastes and carbon footprints, which are two of the main causes of global temperature rising uncontrollably, have been traced back to major countries such as China and USA, hence making them more suitable to take on more responsibility than others. According to the reference above, therefore, a certain demographic society claims that developed states should be more active and put more effort into dealing with this climate issue, however, this idea is not the case for others.
On the other hand, developing countries are also found to be guilty of contributing to the root of said problem due to their poorly managed domestic waste control and recycling system as well as deforestation protection policies, making it reasonable for all nations around the world to come together and put out an end to this problematic situation. Indeed, countries located in the south east, middle east and north west Asia such as India, Iran, Cambodia and Laos, are struggling to allocate their trashes to minimize the total amount of unusable wastes. Moreover, these nations fail to maintain a healthy balance of the overall deforestation rate within their respective countries due to the loosely implemented illegal forest cutting prevention policies. Due to the point of argument mentioned above, some people believe that the job of protecting the environment should be equally divided by all countries.
In conclusion, this essay addressed both sides of the arguments in the attempt to determine which side is correct. From a personal perspective, it is ethical for all nations and races to take part in the battle of returning the climate back to normal as well as keeping the environment safe.
With the advancement of technology, the world continues to prosper economic stability and urbanization more than ever,
however
,
in contrast
to such achievements,
people
faces
increasing natural disasters such as storms, earthquakes and
climate
change
. In order to respond
effectively
to the major threat, which is
climate
change
, humanity is facing, there are
some
suggestions to
make
developed
countries
bare more obligation to solve this issue.
Conversely
, oppositions to
this
ideas
have
also
been raised
, claiming that all
nations
, with no regards to the development level,
must
equally
part take in this together. This essay will address both sides of the argument.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that more advanced and powerful
countries
must
lead the way to freeing the world from the irregular
changes
of the seasons as they possess more capability and produce more
wastes
which lead to bigger contribution as to why this natural phenomenon happens in the
first
place.
In addition
, modernized
nations
are
financially
capable to support new policies made to
fix
this issue
as well
as increasing the rate of recycling, which
further
help
to
cut
down the speed of the changing
climate
.
For instance
, according to a recent research conducted at the
university of Oxford
, 67% of
wastes
and carbon footprints, which are two of the main causes of global temperature rising
uncontrollably
, have
been traced
back to major
countries
such as China and USA,
hence
making them more suitable to take on more responsibility than others. According to the reference above,
therefore
, a certain demographic society claims that developed states should be more active and put more effort into dealing with this
climate
issue,
however
, this
idea
is not the case for others.
On the other hand
, developing
countries
are
also
found to be guilty of contributing to the root of said problem due to their
poorly
managed domestic
waste
control and recycling system
as well
as deforestation protection policies, making it reasonable for all
nations
around the world to
come
together and put out an
end
to this problematic situation.
Indeed
,
countries
located in the
south east
,
middle east
and
north west
Asia such as India, Iran, Cambodia and Laos, are struggling to allocate their trashes to minimize the total amount of unusable
wastes
.
Moreover
, these
nations
fail to maintain a healthy balance of the
overall
deforestation rate within their respective
countries
due to the
loosely
implemented illegal forest cutting prevention policies. Due to the point of argument mentioned above,
some
people
believe that the job of protecting the environment should be
equally
divided by all countries.
In conclusion
, this essay addressed both sides of the arguments in the attempt to determine which side is correct. From a personal perspective, it is ethical for all
nations
and races to
take part
in the battle of returning the
climate
back to normal
as well
as keeping the environment safe.