It is argue that whether schoolchidren should study in the highly competitive environment. While many individuals believe that competing with others would benefit children in many circumstances, I would argue that cooperative environment is better for chidren themselves.
On the one hand, there are various reasons why teenagers should learn in the competitive classroom. Firstly, thanks to this environment, children could be encouraged to make great strides in their study so as to become the high achievers. As a result, some top classmates would be recognized and given to specialised classes to nurture their academic ability. In my high school, for example, students often take examination during the term to classify those gifted students and give them to the extra classes to take national competitions. Secondly, the competitive environment could expose children to the real world, where they have to compete with others. If, for instance, youngsters are taught to compete, then they will have a wealth of experience and easily find a job in the intensely competitive society.
On the other hand, I strongly agree with those people who believe that collaborative learning could result in more favourable outcomes. The first reason is that teamwork spirit is of paramount importance for schoolchildren in the classroom context because it allows them to make the most of each member strengths and minimize weaknesses. Consequently, productivity could be promoted and individual student would identify and overcome their own weaknesses. Furthermore, cooperative environment could foster social solidarity, which is vitally important for student future career seeing that each team project in company would always be assigned in group instead of just one member.
In conclusion, it seems to me that collaboration between students brings more benefits, although competitive environment also stand students in good stead to some extent.
It is
argue
that whether
schoolchidren
should study in the
highly
competitive
environment
. While
many
individuals believe that competing with others would benefit children in
many
circumstances, I would argue that cooperative
environment
is better for
chidren
themselves.
On the one hand, there are various reasons why
teenagers
should learn in the
competitive
classroom.
Firstly
, thanks to this
environment
, children could
be encouraged
to
make
great strides in their study
so as to
become the high achievers.
As a result
,
some
top classmates would
be recognized
and
given
to
specialised
classes to nurture their academic ability. In my high school,
for example
,
students
often
take examination during the term to classify those gifted
students
and give them to the extra classes to take national competitions.
Secondly
, the
competitive
environment
could expose children to the real world, where they
have to
compete with others. If,
for instance
, youngsters
are taught
to compete, then they will have a wealth of experience and
easily
find a job in the
intensely
competitive
society.
On the other hand
, I
strongly
agree
with those
people
who believe that collaborative learning could result in more
favourable
outcomes. The
first
reason is that teamwork spirit is of paramount importance for schoolchildren in the classroom context
because
it
allows
them to
make
the most of each member strengths and minimize weaknesses.
Consequently
, productivity could
be promoted
and individual
student
would identify and overcome their
own
weaknesses.
Furthermore
, cooperative
environment
could foster social solidarity, which is
vitally
important
for
student
future career seeing that each team project in
company
would always
be assigned
in group
instead
of
just
one member.
In conclusion
, it seems to me that collaboration between
students
brings more benefits, although
competitive
environment
also
stand
students
in
good
stead to
some
extent.
12Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
17Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
6Mistakes