Once endemic in western countries, now it is commonplace for job holders in many parts of the world to switch jobs. In spite of some relative merits of job-hopping, I maintain this put an individual at a significant disadvantage.
A new job may bring about the change a person desperately needs in their career. First, an employee, having worked in the same position for a year or two, often starts to feel the sheer boredom of performing routine tasks day in day out and seek even a slight chance to break the habits. For many, this means a complete waste of their talents and time. The lethal combination of boredom and lack of prosperity push them towards venturing out, back to the job-seeking battlefield. A toxic work environment, constant conflict with colleagues, or a tyrant boss may also tip the person to the brink of jumping from the current job.
Job-hopping, meanwhile, can be the answer for such employee’s prayers. Plus, a job-hopper stands a better chance of getting promoted and receiving a salary raise, which seems more likely rather from within. Furthermore, job-hoppers have the privilege to expand their career experience and foster their abilities, both soft and technical, as they are exposed to a larger variety of business environment and duties. This in turn not only adds more bullet points in their resume, but creates the impression of being well-experienced while applying for a job.
On the flip side, however, changing from job to job does have its downside. Firstly, most employers, while recruiting, frown upon job applicants whose resume signals they are not going to stay put, labeling them as disloyal and unreliable. They prefer to hire someone who is expected to hold the position long enough to justify the effort of recruitment; a person who truly belongs, not a curious visitor who tends to jump off the ship in case of trouble. Second, switching jobs periodically, a job holder often fails to build in-depth knowledge, mostly touching on different areas and skills. Although in some business this may be regarded as an advantage, in many more, nonetheless, it has adverse effects on the employee’s career.
In conclusion, while changing regularly from job to job may have potential benefits for a job applicant mainly through expanding knowledge and experience, not knowing the time to cease job-hopping will spill the end of one’s otherwise thriving career. 
Once endemic in western countries,  
now
 it is commonplace for  
job
 holders in  
many
 parts of the world to switch  
jobs
.  
In spite of
  some
 relative merits of job-hopping, I maintain this put an individual at a significant disadvantage.
A new  
job
 may bring about the  
change
 a person  
desperately
 needs in their career.  
First
, an employee, having worked in the same position for a year or two,  
often
  starts
 to feel the sheer boredom of performing routine tasks day in day out and seek even a slight chance to break the habits. For  
many
, this means a complete waste of their talents and time. The lethal combination of boredom and lack of prosperity push them towards venturing out, back to the job-seeking battlefield. A toxic work environment, constant conflict with colleagues, or a tyrant boss may  
also
 tip the person to the brink of jumping from the  
current
 job.
Job-hopping, meanwhile, can be the answer for such employee’s prayers. Plus, a job-hopper stands a better chance of getting promoted and receiving a salary raise, which seems more likely  
rather
 from within.  
Furthermore
, job-hoppers have the privilege to expand their career experience and foster their abilities, both soft and technical, as they  
are exposed
 to a larger variety of business environment and duties. This in turn not  
only
  adds
 more bullet points in their resume,  
but
 creates the impression of being well-experienced while applying for a job.
On the flip side,  
however
, changing from  
job
 to  
job
 does have its downside.  
Firstly
, most employers, while recruiting, frown upon  
job
 applicants whose resume signals they are not going to stay put, labeling them as disloyal and unreliable. They prefer to hire someone who is  
expected
 to hold the position long  
enough
 to justify the effort of recruitment; a person who  
truly
 belongs, not a curious visitor who tends to jump off the ship in case of trouble. Second, switching  
jobs
  periodically
, a  
job
 holder  
often
 fails to build in-depth knowledge,  
mostly
 touching on  
different
 areas and  
skills
. Although in  
some
 business this may  
be regarded
 as an advantage, in  
many
 more, nonetheless, it has adverse effects on the employee’s career. 
In conclusion
, while changing  
regularly
 from  
job
 to  
job
 may have potential benefits for a  
job
 applicant  
mainly
 through expanding knowledge and experience, not knowing the time to cease job-hopping will spill the  
end
 of one’s  
otherwise
 thriving career.