People are always arguing how to punish the person who broken the law. Some citizens say they should be put into the prison, however, others hold different opinions, such as requiring community service for people convicted of misdemeanour. From my perspective, a flexible solution is highly recommended.
Putting the criminals in jail is necessary for who seriously violate the law. All convicts deserve punishment to varying degrees, and only by depriving them of the their freedom for a period of time can they truly examine their own conscience realise the price for their errors. Besides, for those who commit felonies such as robbery or murder, confinement can effectively prevent them from repeating their evils. No one can imagine what will happen if a ferocious killer is at large.
However, restriction of their freedom is not the ultimate goal of prisons. In order to transform those convicts into good citizens, such as low knowledge promotion, job training, and community services are still necessary. Sometimes, poverty and ignorance cause some people to commit crimes, but they are might not so evil. If they come out of prison with the skills and knowledge to survive, they should no longer do things that harm society. On the other hand, Prison operation requires big government spending, therefore putting all lawbreakers in jail is unreasonable. Thus the person who violates the law badly, such as breaching of traffic rules or damage to environmental hygiene, punish them to do some services in the community should be a better idea.
In conclusion, who to punish the lawbreaker should depend what they have done and putting them in jail is not the only solution. Hence providing an opportunity for them to learn skills or knowledge is necessary for their life change.
People
are always arguing how to punish the person
who
broken the law.
Some
citizens say they should
be put
into the
prison
,
however
, others hold
different
opinions, such as requiring community service for
people
convicted of
misdemeanour
. From my perspective, a flexible solution is
highly
recommended.
Putting the criminals in jail is necessary for
who
seriously
violate the law. All convicts deserve punishment to varying degrees, and
only
by depriving them of
the their freedom
for a period of time can they
truly
examine their
own
conscience
realise
the price for their errors.
Besides
, for those
who
commit felonies such as robbery or murder, confinement can
effectively
prevent
them from repeating their evils. No one can imagine what will happen if a ferocious killer is at large.
However
, restriction of their freedom is not the ultimate goal of
prisons
. In order to transform those convicts into
good
citizens, such as low knowledge promotion, job training, and community services are
still
necessary.
Sometimes
, poverty and ignorance cause
some
people
to commit crimes,
but
they are might not
so
evil. If they
come
out of
prison
with the
skills
and knowledge to survive, they should no longer do things that harm society.
On the other hand
,
Prison
operation requires
big
government
spending,
therefore
putting all lawbreakers in jail is unreasonable.
Thus
the person
who
violates the law
badly
, such as breaching of traffic
rules
or damage to environmental hygiene, punish them to do
some
services in the community should be a better
idea
.
In conclusion
,
who
to punish the lawbreaker should
depend
what they have done and putting them in jail is not the
only
solution.
Hence
providing an opportunity for them to learn
skills
or knowledge is necessary for their life
change
.