Nowadays, individual privacies are often published by newspapers and protecting personal information is a heated topic. Therefore, some people think the government should provide certain policies to control this phenomenon, but others hold an opposite opinion. I would like to explore both sides thoroughly first.
On the one hand, some people’s personal data should be published, such as criminals and government officials, because their behaviours could influence the safety and stability of society. Fist of all, release the vital information of convicts on the urn can help the police to catch them. Only when the lawbreaker is arrested can justice be maintained and social security guaranteed. Besides, political leaders’ behaviours could influence regional or even national stability. Therefore, reporting their certain key information and activities is beneficial to supervise by the public, which could restrict the abusing of their power.
On the other hand, it is immoral for the media to report citizens’ personal life and privacy for the sake of interest, which is against their privacy right. For example, there are many innocent people who fall victim to the profits of the media, which report a lot of their unique and harmless activities, because these amusement topics would attract a large number of readers. However, at the same time, victims and their families might under enormous public pressures. No one like to be judged on their personal life all the time. If newspapers publish this type of information frequently, everyone would worry about themselves will be a title on the paper one day.
In conclusion, I think the government should provide polices to control the media a part of reports of individuals’ personal information, otherwise, it would against the many innocent citizens’ benefits.
Nowadays, individual
privacies
are
often
published by newspapers and protecting
personal
information
is a heated topic.
Therefore
,
some
people
think
the
government
should provide certain policies to control this phenomenon,
but
others hold an opposite opinion. I would like to explore both sides
thoroughly
first
.
On the one hand,
some
people
’s
personal
data should
be published
, such as criminals and
government
officials,
because
their
behaviours
could influence the safety and stability of society. Fist of all, release the vital
information
of convicts on the urn can
help
the police to catch them.
Only
when the lawbreaker
is arrested
can justice
be maintained
and social security guaranteed.
Besides
, political leaders’
behaviours
could influence regional or even national stability.
Therefore
, reporting their certain key
information
and activities is beneficial to supervise by the public, which could restrict the abusing of their power.
On the other hand
, it is immoral for the media to report citizens’
personal
life and privacy for the sake of interest, which is against their privacy right.
For example
, there are
many
innocent
people
who fall victim to the profits of the media, which report
a lot of
their unique and harmless activities,
because
these amusement topics would attract
a large number of
readers.
However
, at the same time, victims and their families might under enormous public pressures. No one like to
be judged
on their
personal
life all the time. If newspapers publish this type of
information
frequently
, everyone would worry about themselves will be a title on the paper one day.
In conclusion
, I
think
the
government
should provide polices to control the media a part of reports of individuals’
personal
information
,
otherwise
, it would against the
many
innocent citizens’ benefits.