It is true that history should be played an essential part in school. While many people suppose that this may suit for educational system recently, I would argue that practical subjects which can apply on a daily basis are much more necessary than others.
On the one hand, there are two prime reasons why all students should be exposed to history at school. Firstly, they can know their roots and how modern civilisation has come to surely make them much more appreciative of our predecessors. For instance, thanks to history, I broaden my horizon that Vietnam’s liberation in 1975 could be considered one of the biggest milestones in the history of Vietnam, making our country free from colonisation. Secondly, historical events are the meaningful lessons which enable them to learn from past mistake and ensure it never happens again. To be specific, history lessons help them understand change including successes and failures, and how others are affected by it. Thus, they would avoid the similar outcomes in the future.
On the other hand, I believe that children should learn other subjects relating to children’s lives. One reason is that the way history is taught in most schools is rather tedious, so it would waste a lot of time for useful subjects like English or math. Children would be much more confident when they mastered in foreign language compared to historical events, as it is a better way to catch up with the global knowledge-based economy. In addition, informatics could help students nurturing and developing vital soft skills through leading-edge technologies. Thus, they might gain countless opportunities to seek a good job, because ‘Information Technology’ is one of the most popular jobs with not only high salary but also the dynamic working environment.
In conclusion, although it has benefits for children to study history, it seems to me that actual subjects are the perfect alternative to in class history lessons.
It is true that
history
should
be played
an essential part in school. While
many
people
suppose that this may suit for educational system recently, I would argue that practical
subjects
which can apply on a daily basis are much more necessary than others.
On the one hand, there are two prime reasons why all students should
be exposed
to
history
at school.
Firstly
, they can know their roots and how modern
civilisation
has
come
to
surely
make
them much more appreciative of our predecessors.
For instance
, thanks to
history
, I broaden my horizon that Vietnam’s liberation in 1975 could
be considered
one of the biggest milestones in the
history
of Vietnam, making our country free from
colonisation
.
Secondly
, historical
events
are the meaningful lessons which enable them to learn from past mistake and ensure it never happens again. To be specific,
history
lessons
help
them understand
change
including successes and failures, and how others are
affected
by it.
Thus
, they would avoid the similar outcomes in the future.
On the other hand
, I believe that
children
should learn other
subjects
relating to
children’s
lives
. One reason is that the way
history
is taught
in most schools is
rather
tedious,
so
it would waste
a lot of
time for useful
subjects
like English or math.
Children
would be much more confident when they mastered in foreign language compared to historical
events
, as it is a better way to catch up with the global knowledge-based economy.
In addition
, informatics could
help
students nurturing and developing vital soft
skills
through leading-edge technologies.
Thus
, they might gain countless opportunities to seek a
good
job,
because
‘Information Technology’ is one of the most popular jobs with not
only
high salary
but
also
the dynamic working environment.
In conclusion
, although it has benefits for
children
to study
history
, it seems to me that actual
subjects
are the perfect alternative to in
class
history
lessons.