Some would argue that the celebration of car-free day at the global level is an efficacious method of reducing air pollutants, while others believe that there are a plethora of alternatives available to combat air pollution. This essay will argue that although using alternate ways give more benefits in declining emission, I believe that globally car-free day will create awareness among nations.
Other methods like the use of eco-friendly cars will decrease the carbon dioxide emission due to the use of bio-diesel. In other words, these vehicles contribute less to greenhouse gases and as a result, it helps in the decline of the temperature of the earth planet. For illustration, environmental protection agencies reveal that bio-diesel when burn in cars produce only 5% of carbon dioxide whereas traditional diesel in cars produces 75% carbon dioxide. However, I believe that this an expansive approach because engines of cars should be replaced for its proper working and extraction of bio-diesel is also a costly process which is unaffordable by a common man.
On the other hand, leaving cars for a day on an international level will let people think about how much they contribute to causing air pollution. Diesel and petrol use in cars emit carbon dioxide and methane which are poisonous gases and a major source of pollution. Hence, this practice will lead them the use of bicycles and alternative mode of transportation. For instance, in the United Kingdom, on daily basis vehicles are emitting greenhouse gases which later mix with air and cause pollution. I believe that through this awareness campaign people will eventually limit the use of cars in their lives and they would protect their environment.
To conclude, although environmental friendly practices are the most viable solution, these are much expensive, while I believe that car-free day will educate the public and they will inculcate good practices in their routine.
Some
would argue that the celebration of car-free day at the global level is an efficacious method of reducing
air
pollutants, while others
believe
that there are a plethora of alternatives available to combat
air
pollution
. This essay will argue that although using alternate ways give more benefits in declining emission, I
believe
that globally car-free day will create awareness among nations.
Other methods like the
use
of eco-friendly
cars
will decrease the
carbon
dioxide emission due to the
use
of bio-diesel.
In other words
, these vehicles contribute less to greenhouse gases and
as a result
, it
helps
in the decline of the temperature of the earth planet. For illustration, environmental protection agencies reveal that bio-diesel when burn in
cars
produce
only
5% of
carbon
dioxide whereas traditional diesel in
cars
produces 75%
carbon
dioxide.
However
, I
believe
that this an expansive approach
because
engines of
cars
should
be replaced
for its proper working and extraction of bio-diesel is
also
a costly process which is unaffordable by a common
man
.
On the other hand
, leaving
cars
for a day on an international level will
let
people
think
about how much they contribute to causing
air
pollution
. Diesel and petrol
use
in
cars
emit
carbon
dioxide and methane which are poisonous gases and a major source of
pollution
.
Hence
, this practice will lead them the
use
of bicycles and alternative mode of transportation.
For instance
, in the United Kingdom, on daily basis vehicles are emitting greenhouse gases which later mix with
air
and cause
pollution
. I
believe
that through this awareness campaign
people
will
eventually
limit the
use
of
cars
in their
lives and
they would protect their environment.
To conclude
, although environmental friendly practices are the most viable solution, these are much expensive, while I
believe
that car-free day will educate the
public and
they will inculcate
good
practices in their routine.