Imprisonment nowadays is often blamed for the high cost to establish and the negative impacts on prisoners’ future life. I absolutely agree with both criticisms.
When it comes to the budget spent on running prisons, it is true to say that it is unnecessarily expensive. This often covers constructing and maintaining imprisoning facilities with highly sensitive security system compared to normal buildings, recruiting well-trained staff as well as offering basic needs for the offenders. In legal terms, all of these costs are necessary to punish those having committed criminal acts along with protecting the society from the law-breaking individuals. However, there are many other far cheaper methods, typified by banning identified criminals from leaving their own accommodation with GPS tracking and community control, which bring similar benefits as prisons do. Therefore, the argument against prison cost is understandably solid.
Turning to the effects of prisons on the criminals, they are arguably negative. Isolating prisoners from the outside world alone helps prevent bad people from not only harming the society temporarily but also any chances of working legally or getting suitable training. These individuals often already do not have necessary skills to work as normal citizens, and incarcerations only make their prospects worse by forcing them to do nothing in years. As a result, ex-prisoners often find it difficult to have a normal life and are more likely to commit crime again.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that prisons do nothing to help those who have committed illegal activities despite receiving unacceptably huge investments. Crime can only be solved effectively if incarcerations are combined with other feasible strategies like education and rehabilitation.
Imprisonment nowadays is
often
blamed for the high cost to establish and the
negative
impacts on prisoners’ future life. I
absolutely
agree
with both criticisms.
When it
comes
to the budget spent on running
prisons
, it is true to say that it is
unnecessarily
expensive. This
often
covers constructing and maintaining imprisoning facilities with
highly
sensitive security system compared to normal buildings, recruiting well-trained staff
as well
as offering basic needs for the offenders. In legal terms, all of these costs are necessary to punish those having committed criminal acts along with protecting the society from the law-breaking individuals.
However
, there are
many
other far cheaper methods, typified by banning identified criminals from leaving their
own
accommodation with GPS tracking and community control, which bring similar benefits as
prisons
do.
Therefore
, the argument against
prison
cost is
understandably
solid.
Turning to the effects of
prisons
on the criminals, they are
arguably
negative
. Isolating prisoners from the outside world alone
helps
prevent
bad
people
from not
only
harming the society
temporarily
but
also
any chances of working
legally
or getting suitable training. These individuals
often
already do not have necessary
skills
to work as normal citizens, and incarcerations
only
make
their prospects worse by forcing them to do nothing in years.
As a result
, ex-prisoners
often
find it difficult to have a normal life and are more likely to commit crime again.
In conclusion
, I
strongly
believe that
prisons
do nothing to
help
those who have committed illegal activities despite receiving
unacceptably
huge investments. Crime can
only
be solved
effectively
if incarcerations
are combined
with other feasible strategies like education and rehabilitation.