Films are generally considered to be art. While it is believed by some that, it is unnecessary to go to the theatre as movies can be viewed on phones and tablets, others argue that in order to enjoy movies one needs to visit the movie theatre. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument and explain my support for the latter view
Those who support the view that watching movies on devices is a substitute for viewing centers may argue that on the basis of cost effectiveness. This is because the amount of money spent watching motion pictures, as well as, on transportation could be channeled into other more productive activities such as health bills. According to a survey carried out by Universal Studios, in 2017, for example, revealed that the was a gradual decrease in the number of movie goers from 2014 to 2016, and about 40% revealed that this was due to the amount of money being spent on transportation and the movie itself. If the government would provide free public transport so that people found it easier to transport themselves this might reduce the financial burden.
However, I would argue that for a movie to be enjoyed fully, it needs to be viewed in a film house because of the effects the environment has on our health. This implies that, the theatre has a lot of extra activities such as video games, which helps as a stress reliever and also with relaxation. Taking the example of a medical doctor, who after working a 48 hour shift needs to relax before going home, chooses the entertainment center because of the effect it has on the body and mind. If this centers were closed due to low attendance, the rate of stress induced illnesses would likely increase resulting in the need for cinemas.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that for one to get the full benefits of a movie, one should visit the film house because this improves the quality of life by decreasing stress.
Films are
generally
considered to be art. While it
is believed
by
some
that, it is unnecessary to go to the
theatre
as
movies
can
be viewed
on phones and tablets, others argue that in order to enjoy
movies
one
needs
to visit the
movie
theatre
. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument and
explain
my support for the latter
view
Those who support the view that watching
movies
on devices is a substitute for viewing centers may argue that on the basis of
cost effectiveness
. This is
because
the amount of money spent watching motion pictures,
as well
as, on transportation could
be channeled
into other more productive activities such as health bills. According to a survey carried out by Universal Studios, in 2017,
for example
, revealed that
the
was a gradual decrease in the number of
movie
goers from 2014 to 2016, and about 40% revealed that this was due to the amount of money
being spent
on transportation and the
movie
itself. If the
government
would provide
free public transport
so
that
people
found it easier to transport themselves this might
reduce
the financial burden.
However
, I would argue that for a
movie
to
be enjoyed
fully
, it
needs
to
be viewed
in a film
house
because
of the effects the environment has on our health.
This implies that
, the
theatre
has
a lot of
extra activities such as video games, which
helps
as a
stress
reliever and
also
with relaxation. Taking the example of a medical doctor, who after working a
48 hour
shift
needs
to relax
before
going home, chooses the entertainment center
because
of the effect it has on the body and mind. If
this
centers
were closed
due to low attendance, the rate of
stress
induced illnesses would likely increase resulting in the
need
for cinemas.
In conclusion
, I am of the opinion that for one to
get
the full benefits of a
movie
, one should visit the film
house
because
this
improves
the quality of life by decreasing
stress
.