Should the government advocate development at the cost of demolishing historic buildings? Absolutely not! Even thought some may concur that it is essential to replace them with modern buildings, another school of thought have completely opposing views. In my opinion, history should be cherished rather than destroyed and the same shall be analyzed in this essay.
To begin with, historic buildings are the final thread of connection to our rich and varied history. They remind us of the struggles and efforts undertaken by our ancestors to safeguard the people and preserve the culture. Secondly, many buildings have an ancient construction, particularly the colonial structures, which are very rare to witness these day. Hence, these have been converted into local attractions that attract countless of tourists and generates income for the government. For example, the Taj Mahal, which is an important structure in Indian history, is frequented by many and is also considered to be one of the major contributors to the tourism industry. If we demolish these structures to build modern buildings, there will be serious repercussions.
Similarly, these historic buildings are considered to be a symbol of pride. Instead of breaking them down, the government should make efforts to restore them to their former glory. Although, due to the housing problem it is vital to build modern buildings, but that cannot be achieved by compromising historic buildings. For instance, in India many significantly important buildings were broken down to pave the way for new constructions, however, the housing problems still persists and remains unresolved. Therefore, the government should in evidently adopt alternative approach rather than just ruthlessly tearing down historic structures.
In conclusion, I believe historic buildings should be preserved since they are a reminder of the history and also enhances tourism that contributes to the economy. Furthermore, the government should maintain them as they are a symbol of gratification for the country.
Should the
government
advocate development at the cost of demolishing
historic
buildings
?
Absolutely
not! Even
thought
some
may concur that it is essential to replace them with modern
buildings
, another school of
thought
have completely opposing views. In my opinion,
history
should
be cherished
rather
than
destroyed
and the same shall
be analyzed
in this essay.
To
begin
with,
historic
buildings
are the final thread of connection to our rich and varied
history
. They remind us of the struggles and efforts undertaken by our ancestors to safeguard the
people
and preserve the culture.
Secondly
,
many
buildings
have an ancient construction,
particularly
the colonial structures, which are
very
rare to witness
these day
.
Hence
, these have
been converted
into local attractions that attract
countless of tourists
and generates income for the
government
.
For example
, the Taj Mahal, which is an
important
structure in Indian
history
,
is frequented
by
many
and is
also
considered to be one of the major contributors to the tourism industry. If we demolish these structures to build modern
buildings
, there will be serious repercussions.
Similarly
, these
historic
buildings
are considered
to be a symbol of pride.
Instead
of breaking them down, the
government
should
make
efforts to restore them to their former glory. Although, due to the housing problem it is vital to build modern
buildings
,
but
that cannot
be achieved
by compromising
historic
buildings
.
For instance
, in India
many
significantly
important
buildings
were broken
down to pave the way for new constructions,
however
, the housing problems
still
persists and remains unresolved.
Therefore
, the
government
should in
evidently
adopt alternative approach
rather
than
just
ruthlessly
tearing down
historic
structures.
In conclusion
, I believe
historic
buildings
should
be preserved
since they are a reminder of the
history
and
also
enhances tourism that contributes to the economy.
Furthermore
, the
government
should maintain them as they are a symbol of gratification for the country.