It is true that the growth of economy is a good factor for a country’s development. While some people state that economic progress can address social problems such as hunger and poverty; others believe that this development brings more harm to the environment. Personally, I completely agree with the former view for a number of reasons.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why economic growth exerts a negative effect on the environment. Firstly, it is clear that revenue from companies and factories contribute considerably into national budget. As a result, there are more industrial zones constructed, which release toxic fumes into the air. Therefore, air pollution is becoming more serious and leads to environmental degradation. Secondly, the appearance of buildings requires a large amount of land and this leads to the damage on natural habitats. It is undoubted that wild habitats play a large role in the ecosystem balance. Therefore, human activities to serve for economic benefits would leave serious consequences.
On the other hand, I believe that economic progress helps a country to deal with hunger and poverty. To begin with, it is clear that underdeveloped and developing countries are facing these head- aching concern due to the shortage of money. Thanks to economic growth, the government has enough money to take actions. For example, the state provides sufficient foods to rural areas for people who suffer from hunger. Moreover, the development of economy would increase the living standard of its residents. People have a chance to get a decent job in industrial zones. Thanks to the salaries earned, these people are able to be out of poverty and lead a healthy lifestyle.
In conclusion, it seems to me that economic boost brings more benefits than drawbacks to a country. However, we should take appropriate actions to reduce negative impacts on the environment. Only by doing this can we live in an affluent and healthy country.
It is true that the growth of economy is a
good
factor for a
country’s
development. While
some
people
state that
economic
progress can address social problems such as hunger and poverty; others believe that this development brings more harm to the environment.
Personally
, I completely
agree
with the former view for a number of reasons.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why
economic
growth exerts a
negative
effect on the environment.
Firstly
, it is
clear
that revenue from
companies
and factories contribute
considerably
into national budget.
As a result
, there are more industrial zones constructed, which release toxic fumes into the air.
Therefore
, air pollution is becoming more serious and leads to environmental degradation.
Secondly
, the appearance of buildings requires a large amount of land and this leads to the damage on natural habitats. It
is undoubted
that wild habitats play a large role in the ecosystem balance.
Therefore
, human activities to serve for
economic
benefits would
leave
serious consequences.
On the other hand
, I believe that
economic
progress
helps
a
country
to deal with hunger and poverty. To
begin
with, it is
clear
that underdeveloped and developing
countries
are facing these head- aching concern due to the shortage of money. Thanks to
economic
growth, the
government
has
enough
money to take actions.
For example
, the state provides sufficient foods to rural areas for
people
who suffer from hunger.
Moreover
, the development of economy would increase the living standard of its residents.
People
have a chance to
get
a decent job in industrial zones. Thanks to the salaries earned, these
people
are able to be out of poverty and lead a healthy lifestyle.
In conclusion
, it seems to me that
economic
boost brings more benefits than drawbacks to a
country
.
However
, we should take appropriate actions to
reduce
negative
impacts on the environment.
Only
by doing this can we
live
in an affluent and healthy
country
.