All over the world, governments allocate a portion of their budget for the development of the arts and the culture of the state. The governments build museums and promote the visual arts which has an easy connect with the visitors from all categories. Some argue that the government spending in such areas is unnecessary and should invest in the public services instead. I completely disagree with this notion and the reasons are explained in the following paragraphs.
First of all, the amount spent by the governments on such arts is too small when compared to the investment it makes in the public services. Hence diverting funds from the former to the latter may not achieve anything significant. Second, these arts on display help generate a considerable income for the government as they are always the best tourist attractions. For example, the Louvre Museum in Paris, which displays the paintings of the best ever artists attracts tourists from all over the world.
Also, these artefacts greatly help the younger generation understand the culture and the traditions of our ancestors rather than being taught orally. It has been a custom in almost all the countries to take school children to such places. They entertain, inspire and educate people about the past which, in my opinion, is necessary in today's fast moving world.
Hence, in my opinion, a judicious and a proper investment in the arts will never be a burden on the governments and will instead help them generate a good revenue which can be put to use for improving the public services. 
All over the world,  
governments
 allocate a portion of their budget for the development of the  
arts
 and the culture of the state. The  
governments
 build museums and promote the visual  
arts
 which has an easy connect with the visitors from all categories.  
Some
 argue that the  
government
 spending in such areas is unnecessary and should invest in the public services  
instead
. I completely disagree with this notion and the reasons are  
explained
 in the following paragraphs. 
First of all
, the amount spent by the  
governments
 on such  
arts
 is too  
small
 when compared to the investment it  
makes
 in the public services.  
Hence
 diverting funds from the former to the latter may not achieve anything significant. Second, these  
arts
 on display  
help
 generate a considerable income for the  
government
 as they are always the best tourist attractions.  
For example
, the Louvre Museum in Paris, which displays the paintings of the best ever artists attracts tourists from all over the world. 
Also
, these  
artefacts
  greatly
  help
 the younger generation understand the culture and the traditions of our ancestors  
rather
 than  
being taught
  orally
. It has been a custom in almost all the countries to take school children to such places. They entertain, inspire and educate  
people
 about the past which, in my opinion, is necessary in  
today
's  
fast
 moving world. 
Hence
, in my opinion, a judicious and a proper investment in the  
arts
 will never be a burden on the  
governments
 and will  
instead
  help
 them generate a  
good
 revenue which can  
be put
 to  
use
 for improving the public services.