Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people in developed countries have a higher responsibility to combat climate change than developing countries. Others believe that all countries should have the same responsibility towards protecting the environment. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. v.1

Some people in developed countries have a higher responsibility to combat climate change than developing countries. Others believe that all countries should have the same responsibility towards protecting the environment. v. 1
Different opinions exist regarding the degree of responsibility of nations to fight for our nature. One side attributes more responsibility to developed nations, while the other side promotes equal duties for everyone. This essay will discuss both sides. In my opinion, all nations should face equal responsibility. However, differences in economic power and resources should be kept in mind. Firstly, developed countries should have a greater responsibility to combat climate change because they have greater economic means. This means that they can finance greater and more efficient projects than less developed countries. Besides, their economy will not suffer as much from introducing climate measures, such as CO2 taxes, simply because it is more mature and resistant to change. Additionally, developed nations emitted more greenhouse gases in the past and should therefore take a bigger role in fixing the environmental damages their activities caused. So why should countries rather be equally accountable for taking measures to protect the climate? One major point is that every contribution to fight environmental pollution counts. In other words, saving 100 tons of emissions has the same effect on our nature, whether they are saved in Germany or in Cambodia. For this reason, responsibility should be equally faced. Moreover, it is not logical to categorize nations when all of them face a global problem as well as worldwide consequences. In addition, taking responsibility to convert to a green economy is not a burden, but rather as a great opportunity to introduce new and advanced technologies. In conclusion, there are reasonable justifications for both perspectives concerning balancing responsibility in regard to fighting for the climate. Overall, I think that each nation should contribute its fair share since every single action will count if we want to avoid a climate catastrophe from happening.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Different
opinions exist regarding the degree of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
responsibility
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nations
to fight for our nature. One side attributes more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
responsibility
to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
developed
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nations
, while the other side promotes equal duties for everyone. This essay will discuss both sides. In my opinion, all
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nations
should face equal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
responsibility
.
However
, differences in economic power and resources should be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
kept
in mind.

Firstly
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
developed
countries should have a greater
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
responsibility
to combat
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
climate
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
they have greater
Did you mean "economical" (=affordable, cheap)?
economic
means. This means that they can finance greater and more efficient projects than less
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
developed
countries.
Besides
, their economy will not suffer as much from introducing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
climate
measures, such as CO2 taxes,
simply
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
it is more mature and resistant to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
.
Additionally
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
developed
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nations
emitted more greenhouse gases in the past and should
therefore
take a bigger role in fixing the environmental damages their activities caused.

This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
So
why should countries
rather
be
equally
accountable for taking measures to protect the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
climate
? One major point is that every contribution to fight environmental pollution counts.
In other words
, saving 100 tons of emissions has the same effect on our nature, whether they
are saved
in Germany or in Cambodia.
For this reason
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
responsibility
should be
equally
faced.
Moreover
, it is not logical to categorize
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nations
when all of them face a global problem
as well
as worldwide consequences.
In addition
, taking
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
responsibility
to convert to a green economy is not a burden,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
rather
as a great opportunity to introduce new and advanced technologies.

In conclusion
, there are reasonable justifications for both perspectives concerning balancing
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
responsibility
in regard to fighting for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
climate
.
Overall
, I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that each
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
nation
should contribute its
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
fair
share since every single action will count if we want to avoid a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
climate
catastrophe from happening.
8.5Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
8.5Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
8.5Mistakes

IELTS essay Some people in developed countries have a higher responsibility to combat climate change than developing countries. Others believe that all countries should have the same responsibility towards protecting the environment. v. 1

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
295 words
8.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 8.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 8.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 8.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 8.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts