Researchers have indicated that a number of criminals descend from a low education class. Several people argue that the optimal solution to decrease the crime rate effectively is to offer lawbreakers with a high-quality education in jail, so they will improve their career prospects after being released from a prison sentence. I partly agree with this measure, as it is not the best method of reducing crime.
Admittedly, education in prison may bring some advantage for offenders. Initially, this education can provide prisoners with the work skills that are essential when they reintegrate back into society. They are likely to strengthen their job prospects and may earn a living without intention to do a crime after leaving prison. Also, education shows that the wrongdoers could realize the value of themselves for the community. Instead of discriminating behaviour with criminal, they are still appreciated by the resident and society. As a result, they will try to become a better person and may then discourage many others from living without crime.
However, I still believe that there are other practical solutions to minimize the rate of crime. The first solution is that the government need to enact several strict laws for people turning to crime. With severe punishments such as more extended imprisonment, the resident will be deterred from acting criminal in public. The second measure is another educational method that may have a more robust and more long-lasting impact on the reduction of crime. It is a crime education for young people at school, which assist students in acquiring the necessary knowledge about illegal behaviours and crime prevention. This measure is unequivocal a more sustainable crime-fighting solution than education for criminals.
To conclude, although educating prisoners to have several positive aspects, I firmly hold the view that there are more effective measures to reduce crime such as crime education at school and strict punishments for criminals.
Researchers have indicated that a number of
criminals
descend from a low
education
class
. Several
people
argue that the optimal
solution
to decrease the
crime
rate
effectively
is to offer lawbreakers with a high-quality
education
in jail,
so
they will
improve
their career prospects after
being released
from a prison sentence. I partly
agree
with this
measure
, as it is not the best method of reducing crime.
Admittedly
,
education
in prison may bring
some
advantage for offenders.
Initially
, this
education
can provide prisoners with the work
skills
that are essential when they reintegrate back into society. They are likely to strengthen their job prospects and may earn a living without intention to do a
crime
after leaving prison.
Also
,
education
shows
that the wrongdoers could realize the value of themselves for the community.
Instead
of discriminating
behaviour
with
criminal
, they are
still
appreciated by the resident and society.
As a result
, they will try to become a better person and may then discourage
many
others from living without crime.
However
, I
still
believe that there are other practical
solutions
to minimize the rate of
crime
. The
first
solution
is that the
government
need to enact several strict laws for
people
turning to
crime
. With severe punishments such as more extended imprisonment, the resident will
be deterred
from acting
criminal
in public. The second
measure
is another educational method that may have a more robust and more long-lasting impact on the reduction of
crime
. It is a
crime
education
for young
people
at school, which assist students in acquiring the necessary knowledge about illegal
behaviours
and
crime
prevention. This
measure
is unequivocal a more sustainable crime-fighting
solution
than
education
for criminals.
To conclude
, although educating prisoners to have several
positive
aspects, I
firmly
hold the view that there are more effective
measures
to
reduce
crime
such as
crime
education
at school and strict punishments for
criminals
.