Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Some people claim that not enough of waste from home is been recycled. They say the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you agree or disagree v.1

Some people claim that not enough of waste from home is been recycled. They say the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement. v. 1
It is claimed by a number of individuals that legislation alone is required to promote the reprocessing of wastes which have been thought to be, at present, very scantily done by individual households. I strongly disagree with this notion because this approach is not workable and it is an infringement on the rights of the citizens. The main reason why I disagree with recycling rules is that it is not an efficient strategy to manage waste. This is because authorities would be unable to monitor the compliance of this agenda since it is not practicable to inspect every home. Taking Ghana for example, despite passing a law on rubbish reuse in 2004, there has been no remarkable achievement. Although it may seem sensible to order people to reutilize unused materials, it is not the right solution to the challenges of waste management as it is ineffective, however. Another reason is that this proposal infringes on the rights of the citizens as this development is not essential for survival. If people are forced to embrace the utilization of garbage, the outcome is a legal battle as human rights activists have sued the UK authority in the past. Instead, giving incentives and educating people on the importance of this practice should be the focus of the political administrators. A particularly good illustration is the case of France, a leading country in waste collection, where awards of recognition are given annually to the best family that supports government reprocessing exercise, leading to more commitment and participation. In conclusion, I completely disagree that law enactment is the only way to make people reprocess rubbish as it does not work and it also denies individuals of their freedom. It is my hope that other alternatives, including giving incentives, would be embraced.
It
is claimed
by a number of individuals that legislation alone
is required
to promote the reprocessing of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
wastes
which have been
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
thought
to be, at present,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
scantily
done by individual households. I
strongly
disagree with this notion
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
this approach is not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
workable
and it is an infringement on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rights
of the citizens.

The main reason why I disagree with recycling
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
rules
is that it is not an efficient strategy to manage
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
. This is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
authorities would be unable to monitor the compliance of this agenda since it is not practicable to inspect every home. Taking Ghana
for example
, despite passing a law on rubbish reuse in 2004, there has been no remarkable achievement. Although it may seem sensible to order
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
to reutilize unused materials, it is not the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
right
solution to the challenges of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
management as it is ineffective,
however
.

Another reason is that this proposal infringes on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rights
of the citizens as this development is not essential for survival. If
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
are forced
to embrace the utilization of garbage, the outcome is a legal battle as human
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rights
activists have sued the UK authority in the past.
Instead
, giving incentives and educating
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
on the importance of this practice should be the focus of the political administrators. A
particularly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
illustration is the case of France, a leading country in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
collection, where awards of recognition are
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
annually
to the best family that supports
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
reprocessing exercise, leading to more commitment and participation.

In conclusion
, I completely disagree that law enactment is the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
way to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
reprocess rubbish as it does not work and it
also
denies individuals of their freedom. It is my hope that other alternatives, including giving incentives, would
be embraced
.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
12Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes

IELTS essay Some people claim that not enough of waste from home is been recycled. They say the only way to increase recycling is for government to make it a legal requirement. v. 1

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
296 words
6
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts